ALGÉRIE, TUNISIE, LIBYE, SYRIE : LE GOUVERNEMENT FRANÇAIS ET LES FRÈRES MUSULMANS “CRIMES SANS CHÂTIMENT”

Dans son ouvrage “Crimes sans châtiment”, Jean-Loup Izambert revient sur les collusions qui existent entre les Frères Musulmans et le Pouvoir Français depuis les années 1990, ainsi que sur l’implication des gouvernements Français dans les guerres de Libye et de Syrie.
Radio Courtoisie 2013.05.04 JL Izambert “Crimes sans chatiment”

20130509-231216.jpg

Tunisian Terrorists Are Now Confirmed Members of Syrian Death Squads

20130327-072206.jpg

By Brandon Turbeville, ACTIVIST POST

In yet another blow to the fragile and the entirely fabricated narrative pushed by the United States, NATO, and the Anglo-American powers, a recent broadcast of a Tunisian television program features firsthand accounts demonstrating that the Syrian “rebels” are actually nothing more than religious fanatics, mercenaries, and foreign fighters.

As reported by Salma Bouzid of Tusnisia Live, the Tunisian television show, Attasiaa Massaa, recently featured a clip of a young Tunisian man named Abou Zayd Attounssi who claims that he recently returned to Tunisia after fighting for eight months alongside the inappropriately named “Syrian rebels.”

Further supporting the fundamentalist nature of the majority of the members of the NATO death squads (aka rebels) operating in Syria, Attounssi stated that his initial reason for traveling to Syria to engage in murder, plunder, and torture against innocent people was because “he felt his religion required him to engage in jihad against ‘the enemy.’”

Although it was apparently not the killing that turned Attounssi off from the death squad movement, he nevertheless became disillusioned with it because, “most of the fighters within the Free Syrian army are fighting for the spoils of war and the foreign aid they supposedly get.”

Also featured on the show was the father of Hamza Rjeb, another former death squad member who is now disabled. Rjeb’s father claimed that “the Tunisian government should take full responsibility for his son’s situation and for allowing groups in the country to ‘brainwash’ his son.”

In an interview with Tunisia Live, Ahmed Youssef, a journalist described by Bouzid as “pro-Assad,” stated, “For every Tunisian fighter brought to Syria, Qatar pays 3,000 dollars to the Syrian rebels.” He also claimed that, “most of the Tunisians come from disadvantaged regions in Tunisia with low unemployment,” and stated that the Tunisians fighting in Syria are “considered mercenaries.” Youssef estimated that the number of Tunisian fighters wreaking havoc in Syria is more than 3,500.

Continue reading

Le Leader politique tunisien Chokri Belaid dénonce le Qatar et est Assassiné

20130213-071845.jpg

Mondialisation.ca via E&R

Le Discours ci-après a conduit à l’assassinat du leader politique tunisien Chokri Belaid.

C’est de nos enfants qu’il s’agit !
Intervention de M. Chokri Belaid :

« Ce sont nos enfants et ils devraient rappeler à M. Ghannouchi sa propre jeunesse. Quand on ouvre nos lieux de cultes, nos mosquées légitimement édifiées pour adorer le Dieu unique…

Quand à Tunis on “autorise des agents”, à la solde de criminels US et de l’entité sioniste d’y pénétrer dans le but d’embrigader nos jeunes gens, avant de les “envoyer se faire tuer en Syrie” pour défendre un projet qui n’est pas le leur… Quand on laisse notre pays ouvert à ces voix venues de l’Orient ; ces voix prétendument pieuses, alors qu’elles n’appellent qu’à la “fitna” [sédition, révolte, émeute d’après Wikipédia] et aux illusions…

Quand dans notre pays – le pays de Yadh Fadhel Ben Achour [2], le pays des réformes, du progrès, de la prestigieuse mosquée Zitouna [3] et de son université [4] – on laisse entrer ces tenants de la fitna et de l’ignorance… venus aussi des montagnes de Tora-Bora et d’ailleurs… Quand on les laisse prêcher la violence dans les mosquées et les universités de Tunis… s’adonner à la violence… s’accaparer les prières du Vendredi… prononcer leurs discours incendiaires pour inciter à la zizanie, aux assassinats, aux blasphèmes, à la discorde entre nous, et à la négation de notre identité tunisienne… on oublie qu’ils ne savent rien de la Tunisie !

Ils ne savent rien des valeurs de la Tunisie, vieille de 3 000 ans. Ils ne savent rien de Mohammed ben Arafa al-Werghemmi [1316-1401] qui fut le premier à interdire l’esclavage. Les Américains et les Britanniques n’en savent rien ! Ils ne savent pas que cette région du monde a donné la première Constitution et la première Démocratie du temps de “Carthage”. Ils ne savent pas que la première Constitution du monde musulman et de la patrie arabe date de « Ahd El-Aman » [Pacte de sécurité-1857] et que ce pays a fondé la première centrale syndicale sous la présidence de Mohamed Fadhel Ben Achour [1946]. Ils ne savent rien de rien !
Et les voici qui nous apportent les prêcheurs de la fitna et de l’ignorance, pour nous prendre nos enfants, leur laver le cerveau, les armer, les corrompre de leur argent ; jusqu’à ce que l’on découvre que c’est “une affaire montée par des Services du renseignement”, pour la mise à exécution d’un projet US-sioniste ! Oui… “Le projet qui consiste à partager la Syrie” en de multiples petits états divisés sur des bases ethniques : un État pour les Sunnites, un État pour les Alaouites, un État pour les Druzes, un État pour les Chrétiens… Idem pour le Liban, etc. Où est-ce que tout cela nous mène ?

Cela nous mène à offrir une légitimité à l’entité sioniste en tant qu’État juif. L’État n’est plus que religieux ! Nous ne pouvons plus parler ni de patrie, ni d’union ! Nous ne sommes plus affiliés ni à la patrie, ni à la citoyenneté, ni à l’équité ! Nous ne sommes plus fidèles à nos pays ! Nous ne pouvons plus penser “Al dine lil’Lah wal watan lil’jamih” [La religion pour Dieu et la patrie pour tous] !

Observez où tout cela nous a déjà mené aujourd’hui. Observez notre jeunesse délibérément égarée ; le responsable de cet égarement étant “un gouvernement mêlé à certaines transactions”, transactions qui sont la cause de la transformation des maisons de Dieu en lieux d’endoctrinement. Et, c’est notre peuple qui en paie les frais aujourd’hui ! De jeunes adolescents, sans éducation, sans savoir, et sans expérience. Il a suffi d’une “fatwa” lancée par un individu installé sous un “climatiseur” en Orient, en Arabie saoudite, ou au Qatar, capitale de la normalisation avec l’entité sioniste, pour que nos enfants, la chair de notre chair, aient à en payer les frais ! »
Chokri Belaid

Texte original : vidéo / Truth about Syria, publiée le 06/02/2013

شكري بلعيد و حديث غاية في الأهمية عن سورية
Vidéo transcrite et traduite de l’arabe par Mouna Alno-Nakhal pour Mondialisation.ca.

Bassam Tahhan sur l’assassinat de Chokri Belaid : “la Tunisie otage du Qatar”

Interview du 10 février 2013 à la radio francophone iranienne : Bassam Tahhan, professeur de stratégie et de géopolitique, revient sur l’assassinat du leader politique tunisien Chokri Belaid et dénonce le jeu pervers du Qatar.

Mourad Medelci inflige une leçon à Rafik Bouchlakha

Mourad Medelci

Mourad Medelci

L’incident diplomatique s’est produit lors de la réunion des ministres arabes des Affaires étrangères qui s’est tenue au Caire le 13 novembre 2012. Plus exactement pendant la seconde séance à huis clos, consacrée au dossier palestinien.

Le ministre algérien des Affaires étrangères est intervenu pour demander à ses collègues des « solutions concrètes dans le soutien à Gaza », en s’adressant particulièrement au ministre qatari des Affaires étrangères. Mais, à la grande surprise générale, c’est Rafik Bouchlakha qui a pris la parole pour dire à Mourad Medelci : « En cinquante ans, qu’a-t-elle donc fait l’Algérie pour la cause palestinienne ?».

Habituellement calme et fin diplomate, la réplique de Mourad Medelci a été cinglante et s’adressait à Hamad Ibn Jassim al-Thani et à son esclave tunisien : « A ceux qui s’interrogent où était l’Algérie, je répondrai que nous n’avions pas à renvoyer un ambassadeur sioniste qui ne rêve même pas de mettre les pieds chez nous. Devons-nous par exemple cesser d’exporter notre gaz à l’Entité sioniste ? Devons-nous expulser les bases américaines et celles de l’OTAN de nos territoires dont nous avons juré qu’ils n’y mettront jamais les pieds ? Dites-nous ce que nous devons faire, partir au djihad contre Israël ? C’est ce qu’il y a de plus facile pour un algérien libre, mais garantissez nous votre non trahison, assurez nous que vous ne nous poignarderiez pas dans le dos comme à chaque fois… garantissez nous l’ouverture de vos frontières et nous… ».

Mourad Medelci a terminé son intervention par cette phrase foudroyante : « Nous avons été éduqué dans la haine du sionisme et vous avez été éduqué dans la trahison ».

Nabil Arabi, qui a dû se sentir visé lui aussi, a levé cette séance à huis clos pour la reprendre une heure plus tard.

Source

Obama’s Terror Trade: Analgate

20121105-231136.jpg

By Lame Cherry

My children, in the annals of ANALGATE, there is a telling excrement which when people are made aware of it, it is going to make B. Hussein Obama’s chest thumping in the murder of Sheik bin Laden’s corpse, turn the grey shades of cold blooded murder, because of the exclusives about to be revealed here once again.

Return to September 11th, 2001, and recall how the Bush43 message was one of “justice” in apprehending these terrorists of killing them, for the closure of the terror event either in a grave or by bringing the terrorists to Gitmo for trials to expose all of their crimes.

Revisit now B. Hussein Obama and Eric Holder. What is the first act they performed with terrorists?

Do you not recall the Chinese Muslims which they spent 1 million dollars per head in relocating them from prison to West Indian vacation resorts?

These were Obama’s good terrorists, and his bad terrorists he was having the US military assassinate from Day One in order to bring al Qaeda under the governorship of B. Hussein Obama.

It is tellling if one notes that Nidal Hassan is not tried for the mass murders of US Soldiers and family members at Fort Hood and Obama will not even define him as a terrorist.
Recall the Christmas condom bomber in which Obama was more interested on vacation in taking on Dick Cheney, in the several “Indian” looking agents who were helping this terrorist were released and that was all covered up.

Americans like Hutatree are smeared and imprisoned illegally, but these terrorists of Obama just have a reality of being released or the reality of Mr. Obama apparently fears their ever seeing the light of a court trial for all the secrets they hold.

What are the secrets?

Have you heard in the Obama media anything about the exact names of the claimed Libyan terrorists of Benghazi? Bill Gertz a Conservative named two of the terrorists finally after months, but the reality is apparently for months the Obama intelligence community has know several of the terrorists they employed in his Turkish Muslims had enough warning to arrest a Tunisian Muslim named Ali Harzi, and held him in detention WHILE RELEASING ANOTHER OBAMA OPERATIVE to freedom.

Once again the Obama good and bad terrorists. One is the traitor who must be kept under wraps (traitor to Obama’s hostage strategy of Chris Stevens to help his campaign”) and the other is an Obama mole set free to monitor and shepherd Obama’s al Qaeda in North Africa.

The terrorists being pointed at too in the media are North Africans, when the masterminds of this slipped away back into Asia, so why the reports of only these few select which never appear in American media in working for B. Hussein Obama.

Continue reading

People from Iskandaron (Turkey) complain about Al Qaeda Jihadists Fighting Syria training in their Area

Turkey’s Erdogan Muslim Brotherhood government seems to be very happy infesting Iskandaron (Hatay) province with Jihadists, especially Jabhat Al Nusra fighters, whom are part of Al Qaeda, Levant branch, they’re Takfiris and they’re very extreme, they’re fighting under the so called FSA: Free Syrian Army.

People in the area started complaining of these fighters enjoying their time, gathering, preparing for battles, training and other things in this peaceful province, part of Syria which was illegally annexed to Turkey by France which was occupying Syria then.

The Arab Spring story in a nutshell: Fake springs, post-modern coup d’etat

Within the first few months of 2011, the United States and its allies lost three loyal “friends”: Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, Zine el-Abbidine Ben Ali in Tunisia and Saad Hariri in Lebanon. While Mubarak and Ali were driven out of power by widespread popular uprisings, Hariri was ousted by the parliament.

Inspired by these liberating developments, pro-democracy rebellions against autocratic rulers (and their Western backers) soon spread to other countries such as Bahrain, Yemen, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

As these revolutionary developments tended to politically benefit the “axis of resistance” (consisting of Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas) in the Middle East, the US-Israeli “axis of aggression” and their client states in the region mounted an all-out counterrevolutionary offensive.

Caught off-guard by the initial wave of the Arab Spring in Egypt and Tunisia, the US and its allies struck back with a vengeance. They employed a number of simultaneous tactics to sabotage the Arab Spring. These included: (1) instigating fake instances of the Arab Spring in countries that were/are headed by insubordinate regimes such as those ruling Iran, Syria and Libya; (2) co-opting revolutionary movements in countries such as Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen; (3) crushing pro-democracy movements against “friendly” regimes ruling countries such as Bahrain, Jordan and Saudi Arabia “before they get out of hand,” as they did in Egypt and Tunisia; and (4) using the age-old divide and rule trick by playing the sectarian trump card of Sunnis vs. Shi’ites, or Iranians vs. Arabs.

1. Fake springs, post-modern coup d’etats

Soon after being caught by surprise by the glorious uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia, the counterrevolutionary forces headed by the United States embarked on damage control. A major strategy in pursuit of this objective has been to foment civil war and regime change in “unfriendly” places, and then portray them as part of the Arab Spring.

The scheme works like this: arm and train opposition groups within the “unfriendly” country, instigate violent rebellion with the help of covert mercenary forces under the guise of fighting for democracy; and when government forces attempt to quell the thus-nurtured armed insurrection, accuse them of human rights violations, and begin to embark openly and self-righteously on the path of regime change in the name of “responsibility to protect” the human rights.

As the “weakest link” in the chain of governments thus slated to be changed, Gaddafi’s regime became the first target. It is now altogether common knowledge that contrary to the spontaneous, unarmed and peaceful protest demonstrations in Egypt, Tunisia and Bahrain, the rebellion in Libya was nurtured, armed and orchestrated largely from abroad. Indeed, evidence shows that plans of regime change in Libya were drawn long before the overt onset of the actual civil war. [1]

It is likewise common knowledge that, like the rebellion in Libya, the insurgency in Syria has been neither spontaneous nor peaceful. From the outset it has been armed, trained and organized by the US and its allies. Similar to the attack on Libya, the Arab League and Turkey have been at the forefront of the onslaught on Syria. Also like the Libyan case, there is evidence that preparations for war on Syria had been actively planned long before the actual start of the armed rebellion, which is branded as a case of the Arab Spring. [2]

Dr Christof Lehmann, a keen observer of geopolitical developments in the Middle East, has coined the term “post-modern coup d’etats” to describe the recent North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)-Zionist agenda of regime change in the region. The term refers to an elaborate combination of covert operations, overt military interventions, and “soft-power” tactics a la Gene Sharp:

“A network of think tanks, endowments, funds and foundations, which are behind the overt destabilization of targeted sovereign nations. Their narratives in public policy and for public consumption are deceptive and persuasive. Often they specifically target and co-opt progressive thinkers, media and activists. The product is almost invariably a post-modern coup d’ tat. Depending on the chosen hybridization and the resilience of government, social structures and populations perceived need for reform, the product can be more or less overtly violent. The tactics can be so subtle, involving human rights organizations and the United Nations that they are difficult to comprehend. However subtle they are, the message to the targeted government is invariably ‘go or be gone’”. [3]

Continue reading