Why was Pat Tillman snuffed? A true patriot the shadow government does not want in their ranks. Prayers to all vets in the armed services.
Why was Pat Tillman snuffed? A true patriot the shadow government does not want in their ranks. Prayers to all vets in the armed services.
Pope Francis I has been portrayed in chorus by the Western media as a champion of “Liberation Theology” committed to global poverty alleviation.
Pope Francis has urged world leaders to challenge “all forms of injustice” and resist the “economy of exclusion… the throwaway culture, … and the “culture of death,” [which] … sadly risk becoming passively accepted.”
Who is the Real Pope Francis I ?
Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis I) was one of the main supporters –within the Catholic hierarchy– of Argentina’s military dictatorship which came to power in a CIA supported coup in 1976.
Jorge Mario Bergoglio not only supported the dictatorship, he also played a direct and complicit role in the “Dirty War” (la guerra sucia”) in liaison with the military Junta headed by General Jorge Videla, leading to the arrest, imprisonment, torture and disappearance of progressive Catholic priests and laymen who were opposed to Argentina’s military rule.
GRTV Interview with Michel Chossudovsky
Diagrams: Boeing patents anti-terrorism auto-land system for hijacked airliners – 12/1/2006
Boeing last week received a US patent for a system that, once activated, removes all control from pilots to automatically return a commercial airliner to a predetermined landing location.
The “uninterruptible” autopilot would be activated – either by pilots, by onboard sensors, or even remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck.
Boeing says: “We are constantly studying ways we can enhance the safety, security and effiecency of the world’s airline fleet.”
“There is a need in the industry for a technique that conclusively prevents unauthorised persons for gaining access to the controls of the vehicle and therefore threatening the safety of the passengers onboard the vehicle, and/or other people in the path of travel of the vehicle, thereby decreasing the amount of destruction individuals onboard the vehicle would be capable of causing,” the patent authors write. “In particular, there is a need for a technique that ensures the continuation of the desired path of travel of a vehicle by removing any type of human decision process that may be influenced by the circumstances of the situation, including threats or further violence onboard the vehicle.”
According to the patent, existing preventative measures are less than fullproof – pilots can decide to open the lockable, bullet-proof cockpit doors and federal air marshals can be overpowered and de-armed. Boeing’s alternative has an onboard processor that once activated, disallows pilot inputs and prevents anyone on board from interrupting an emergency landing plan that can be predefined or radioed to the aircraft by airline or government controllers and carried out by the aircraft’s guidance and control system. To make it fully independent, the system has its own power supply, independent of the aircraft’s circuit breakers. The aircraft remains in automatic mode until after landing, when mechanics or government security operatives are called in to disengage the system.
Boeing envisions several methods of activating the system. Options include manual switches for pilots to hit, or possibly force sensors on the cockpit door that would trip the anti-terror mode if a minimum force threshold were crossed, for instance if someone were trying to break down the door. Another option is a remote link whereby airline or government workers in ground facilities would monitor and aircraft and command the automatic control mode “once it is determined that the security of the air vehicle is in jeopardy.” Radio links could also be used to inform ground facilities and nearby aircraft that an aircraft has been placed in the automatic flight mode.
1. What goes up must come down. Airplanes can go up and stay up for long periods of time. But even they must come down eventually. They can land safely or they may crash. But airplanes don’t just disappear. Certainly not these days with all the powerful communication systems, radio and satellite tracking and filmless cameras which operate almost indefinitely and possess huge storage capacities.
2. I wrote about the disabling of MH370’s communication system as well as the signals for GPS. The system must have been disabled or else the ground station could have called the plane. The GPS too must have been disabled or else the flight of MH370 would have been tracked by satellites which normally provide data on all commercial flights, inclusive of data on location, kind of aircraft, flight number, departure airport and destination. But the data seems unavailable. The plane just disappeared seemingly from all screens.
3. MH370 is a Boeing 777 aircraft. It was built and equipped by Boeing. All the communications and GPS equipment must have been installed by Boeing. If they failed or have been disabled Boeing must know how it can be done. Surely Boeing would ensure that they cannot be easily disabled as they are vital to the safety and operation of the plane.
4. A search on the Internet reveals that Boeing in 2006 received a US patent for a system that, once activated, removes all control from pilots to automatically return a commercial airliner to a pre-determined landing location.
5. The Flightglobal.com article by John Croft, datelined Washington DC (1st December, 2006) further mentioned “The ‘uninterruptible’ autopilot would be activated – either by pilot, by on board sensors, or even remotely by radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of the flight deck”.
6. Clearly Boeing and certain agencies have the capacity to take over “uninterruptible control” of commercial airliners of which MH370 B777 is one.
7. Can it not be that the pilot of MH370 lost control of their aircraft after someone directly or remotely activated the equipment for seizure of control of the aircraft.
8. It is a waste of time and money to look for debris or oil slick or to listen for “pings” from the black box. This is most likely not an ordinary crash after fuel was exhausted. The plane is somewhere, maybe without MAS markings.
9. Boeing should explain about this so-called anti-terrorism auto-land system. I cannot imagine the pilots made a soft-landing in rough seas and then quietly drown with the aircraft.
10. Someone is hiding something. It is not fair that MAS and Malaysia should take the blame.
11. For some reason the media will not print anything that involves Boeing or the CIA. I hope my readers will read this.
18 mai 2014 – US intel source claims Ukraine part of NATO secret campaign Gladio; psychopathy tests for our leaders; and a mainstream host storms out the studio after a vicious exchange on false flags.
Seek truth from facts with Questioning the War on Terror author Kevin Barrett, StopImperialism.org’s Eric Draitser, James Corbett of The Corbett Report, and possible 2016 presidential candidate Jesse Ventura.
“Rwanda, 20 ans après : l’histoire truquée” — Un film de Julien Teil et Paul-Éric Blanrue. Une production Topdoc et Apocalypse France.
Vingt ans après le drame, le président du Rwanda Paul Kagame, les médias, les associations “humanitaires”, une grande partie de la classe politique et les réseaux pro-israéliens continuent d’accuser la France d’avoir participé au génocide rwandais. Pour la pensée unique, les Tustis sont les victimes de crimes contre l’humanité commis par les Hutus pro-Français ; jamais leur part de culpabilité n’est mise en évidence ; jamais on n’explique les raisons sordides qui se cachent derrière ce massacre ; jamais n’est mentionné le rôle néfaste des puissances étrangères ayant eu intérêt à provoquer la catastrophe. Il est temps de reprendre l’affaire à zéro et oser dire, preuves à l’appui, que l’histoire officielle a été truquée.
Ce film pose les questions interdites :
Quelle puissance étrangère a-t-elle formé les chefs des rebelles Tutsis, à commencer par l’actuel président du Rwanda Paul Kagame ?
Qui a abattu l’avion du président Juvénal Habyarimana, un assassinat qui a déclenché le plus grand massacre que l’Afrique ait connu depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale ?
Pourquoi certaines ONG ont-elles entretenu d’étranges relations de proximité avec le FPR ? Sous la pression de qui les accords d’Arusha (1993) ont-ils ouvert la route à la victoire du FPR ?
Quel est l’objectif géostratégique poursuivi par les États-Unis, la Grande-Bretagne et Israël dans ces dramatiques événements ?
Avec les interventions des journalistes et auteurs Pierre Péan et Patrick Mbeko, de l’ancienne député américaine Cynthia McKinney, du colonel Robardey, assistant technique de police judicaire au Rwanda, et l’ultime interview de Michael Hourigan, chargé de l’enquête du TPIR auprès de l’ONU.
May 11, 2014
The German newspaper Bild am Sonntag reported on Sunday 400 U.S. mercenaries are working with the junta government in Ukraine to suppress opposition to the coup in the eastern part of the country. The newspaper said the for-profit mercenaries are actively participating in the effort to eliminate anti-coup activists in Slavyansk and possibly other areas in the Donetsk region.
It is not known if Blackwater mercenaries were involved in gunning down voters in eastern Ukraine.
On Thursday we covered a report stating the CIA and the FBI are involved in the effort to quell resistance to the junta. The CIA has been involved with nationalist and fascist Ukrainian groups since the late 1940s.
In March, we reported on the presence of Greystone mercenaries in Donetsk. The mercenaries were “soldiers of fortune proficient in combat operations,” a diplomatic source told Interfax, according to theDaily Mail. “Most of them had operated under private contracts in Iraq, Afghanistan and other states. Most of them come from the United States.”
The Russian Foreign Ministry said the mercenaries were contracted “to suppress civil protests and dissatisfaction.”
“Among the candidates for the role of gendarme is the Barbados-registered company Greystone Limited, which is integrated with the Academi corporation,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “It is an analogue, and, probably and affiliated body of the Blackwater private army, whose employees have repeatedly been accused of committing grievous and systematic human rights abuses in different troubled regions.”
Academi was known as Blackwater and then Xe following its involvement in the murder of 17 Iraqis in Nisour Square, Baghdad, in 2007. Academi’s board of directors includes former Attorney General John Ashcroft, Bobby Ray Inman, the former director of the NSA, and the company’s CEO is a retired Brigadier General, Craig Nixon.
Plum City – (AbelDanger.net). CNN has blocked United States Marine Field McConnell’s plans for a May Day video exposé of Sercodirector Maureen Baginski’s apparent use of a uFly simulator in the March 8 tracking of the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot of MH Flight 370 and hacking of Flash Override privileges on Obama’s Defense Red Switch Network.
In the context of the Tas Times article (see link) and slide in Serco shares, McConnell – a 30 year airline and 22 year military pilot with 23,000 hours of safety – arrived at the uFly site near Toronto airport to find that the owners had a binding contract with CNN and refused to let him make his May Day video.
Abel Danger researchers have therefore made a spoliation inference that CNN is blocking the use of uFly’s Boeing 777-200 simulator to stop anyone from exposing its March 8 Wag the Dog story and the Serco hackers who are managing Obama’s phonyRed Switch search.
McConnell will now look for an independently-booked simulator on which he can make a video to show the probable track flown by the Obama Crossed-Keys Red Switch hackers who allegedly set up a Serco man-in-the-middle attack on the MH 370 pilots and air traffic controllers and apparently generated CNN Wag the Dog stories to conceal the fate of the passengers after a Cat III C landing on the British Indian Ocean Territory of Diego Garcia.
Sinking fast in a Boeing 777 simulator – Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Abel Danger Savage UFly and Serco Plummets
Abel Danger Savage UFly and Serco Plummets
“ex·po·sé (ĕk′spō-zā′) n. 1. An exposure or a revelation of something discreditable. 2. A formal exposition of facts ”
“Flight MH370: Unidentified Radar Blip is the Smoking Gun of the Preliminary Report
Posted on May 1, 2014 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
Quietly and without much fanfare, the Malaysian government has released the preliminary report on the missing Malaysian Airlines flight MH370.
As I speculated the other day, a key aspect of the report, and probably the reason they didn’t wish to release it, is the fact that it does mention the unidentified radar blip that the Malaysian military authorities used to redirect the search for the missing plane. It mentions it as an aircraft with the “possibility” of being Flight 370.
This is an extremely damning development for those who appear intent on insuring the plane is never found and one that could lead to the redirection of the search for Flight MH370 back to the South China Sea… where it belongs. This is from page 3 of the 5 page document published on CNN:
At 00:42:07 MYT, MH 370 was cleared to climb to Flight Level (FL) 1803 and was issued a direct track by LUMPUR APPROACH at Kuala Lumpur Air Traffic Control Centre (KLATCC) to waypoint IGARI. MH 370 was transferred to LUMPUR RADAR at KLATCC at 00:42:52 MYT.
The flight was then cleared to climb to FL 250 at 00:46:51 MYT and subsequently to FL 350 at 00:50:06 MYT. MH 370 reported maintaining FL 350 at 01:01:16 MYT and reported maintaining FL 350 again at 01:07:55 MYT.
At 01:19:24 MYT LUMPUR RADAR at KLATCC instructed MH370 to contact HO CHI MINH Air Traffic Control Centre (HCMATCC) on radio frequency 120.9 MHz. MH 370 acknowledged with “good night Malaysian Three Seven Zero”.
At 01:21:04 MYT, MH370 was observed on the radar screen at KLATCC as it passed over waypoint IGARI.
At 01:21:13 MYT the radar label for MH 370 disappeared from the radar screen at LUMPUR RADAR KLATCC.
It was later established that the transmissions from the Aircraft Communication and Reporting System (ACARS) through satellite communication system occurred at regular intervals starting before MH 370 departed Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia at time 12:56:08 MYT and with the last communication occurred at 01:07:49 MYT.
So far this report details everything that we know about the flight accurately. It jives with the official narrative parroted by the mainstream press. But then the story diverges from the official story, telling us something that we knew from the very first days, but have been lied to about ever since:
A playback of a recording from military primary radar revealed that an aircraft with a possibility of (being) MH 370 had made an air-turn back onto a Westerly heading crossing Peninsular Malaysia. The search area was then extended to the Straits of Malacca.
As I have been saying for 6 weeks now, it is not known whether or not that radar blip which was reported to have made a turn and flown back over Malaysia was Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370. The fact that it was headed directly toward Butterworth Air Force Base at a high rate of speed and military authorities did nothing to intercept it, makes one wonder how much they really knew about what it was and that it didn’t pose a threat.
Below is an image of the official flight path that was included in the preliminary report. Notice they keep the turn-back in yellow signifying it was confirmed that it was Flight 370′s path. In fact, it is still undetermined if that is accurate or not according to the report. There is no follow-up information provided by the Malaysian military to verify that assumption.
Now take a look at that flight path, done in green and red signifying a difference in the flight path’s we know where 370 and the ones we don’t, and look at how it relates to the location of Butterworth Air Force Base (which by the way, has a contingent of Australian fighter planes at the base)
Of course, the mainstream media is doing their best to ignore this painfully obvious problem with the official story.
“There is also confusion surrounding the role of Malaysia’s military on the night of the disappearance. Malaysia’s prime minister has said that the military tracked a plane on its radar that may have been flight MH370 as it made a westerly turn and headed back across the Malaysian peninsular. But the report makes no mention of the military at all” RT
In fact, as pointed out by RT, the preliminary report is grossly undersized, being only 5 pages.
The report also talks about the Inmarsat satellite data being the root cause of the shift in the search area but does not provide that ping data for others to review. Between the unidentified blip provided by the Malaysian military authorities and the highly secretive “ping data” provided by a British company, the search for the missing plane in the South China Sea was halted and redirected almost as quickly as it had begun (Malaysian defense minister announced “unidentified blip” tracking less than 24 hours after the plane was missing) The search began in the South China Sea between Malaysia and Vietnam until it was revealed by satellite data that the missing plane was still airborne for seven-and-a-half hours after it lost contact with air traffic control. After this, researchers analyzing the data said the plane most likely came down somewhere in the southern Indian Ocean, off the coast of Australia. RT
After finding nothing at all in the Indian Ocean Garbage Patch and now calling off the airborne search in that area (in favor of aprivatized undersea mapping project) an Australian company says it has ‘evidence’ that the plane may be in the Bay of Bengal… ready to send us off on yet another wild goose chase.
RT reports on the improbability of this kind of “discovery” and Miles O’Brian’s outrage at it, but doesn’t seem capable of connecting the dots.
GeoResonance, an Australian firm, says it has used spectral analysis from satellite and plane images to detect the presence of aluminum, titanium, and copper in the Bay of Bengal, which it says is from a commercial jet. But GeoResonance’s claims are not supported by the majority of aviation experts.
“My blood is boiling. I’ve talked to the leading experts in satellite capability in NASA, and they know of no technology that is capable of doing this. I am just horrified that a company would use this event to gain attention like this,”Miles O’ Brien, an aviation expert, told CNN RT
In any investigation, when you come up against a wall and are desperate to find the solution, what you do is simply go back to what you know for sure, what you are 100% convinced is part of the equation.
What we know in this case is the plane is not in the Indian Ocean Garbage Patch, at least not where they looked. STEP ONE: What we know is that the “ping data” from Inmarsat is uncorroborated and until it is made available to the public and the Chinese for their own evaluation of it, it should be removed from the equation. If the data is unconfirmed and has yielded no positive results, that is the only logical thing to do.
I can only hope that this development, this anemic preliminary report and it’s rather telling clue, leads the families of those victims of this tragic incident and the Chinese government back to the South China Sea to seek the final fate of their loved ones.
I can only hope that the families and anyone concerned about them apply pressure to the Chinese government to detach a fleet of their vessels to begin anew the search for Flight MH370 in the area where it was last recorded on commercial radar and where it was presumably seen burning and crashing into the South China Sea by the one witness on that oil rig.
That is my hope.”