Qui finance la Cours Pénale Internationale qui fait et défait des Gouvernements et décide à loisir qui est un dictateur ou pas ?
George SOROS, George SOROS, George SOROS.
Qui finance la Cours Pénale Internationale qui fait et défait des Gouvernements et décide à loisir qui est un dictateur ou pas ?
George SOROS, George SOROS, George SOROS.
Perpétuellement considéré dans les médias comme un groupe de femmes « émancipées » et « libérées » et ainsi montré en modèle pour l’opinion, le mouvement « Femen » recouvre pourtant des zones d’ombres quant à ses sponsors, ses financements et sa formation.
Femmes émancipées du Grand Capital ?
Au vu de leurs dernières apparitions sur la scène médiatique (arrivée impromptue au sein de Notre-Dame de Paris, dans le bureau de vote de Berlusconi), les journalistes ont pu constater que les Femen étaient équipées de cartes de presse afin d’infiltrer toutes sortes d’institutions . Cartes de presse de l’Associated Press, agence montée en 1846 par six journaux new-yorkais, et qui a pu renchérir ses affaires en faisant les bons investissements juste au bon moment avant les différents krachs boursiers de l’histoire.
Une agence que l’on découvre financée par les Rockfeller, famille longtemps perçue aux États-Unis comme obsédée par les grands monopoles financiers et à l’origine de nombreuses officines mondialistes (Council on Foreign Relations, Commission Trilatérale, Club Bilderberg…).
Les différentes Femen participant au mouvement se voient recrutées et choisies dans des secteurs où l’argent est roi : de la pornographie  aux réseaux de prostitution estudiantine , il est difficile de voir en ces victimes du monde libéral les Spartacus du Grand Capital, tant elles ne mordent pas la main qui les nourrit mais en vivent, étant payées jusqu’à 1 000 dollars par mois. Il est évident qu’on les verra moins manifester devant les murs de Wall Street…[3Bis]
Femmes émancipées des hommes ?
Bien que les Femen apparaissent dans les médias comme un mouvement « subversif » et « spontané », se trouvent néanmoins à leur tête des « sextremistes » deux éminences grises discrètes et peu mises en avant dans les mass media : Anna Houtsol et Viktor Sviatski. Si l’une (une petite rousse de 27 ans au visage ferme) a grandi dans les années 90 où l’après-URSS a conduit beaucoup d’hommes au chômage, conduisant les femmes de son village d’origine à prendre les devants pour assurer la survie, l’autre est d’une opacité troublante.
Sviatski connaît parfaitement le fonctionnement des médias. Il est toujours présent au quartier général du mouvement en Ukraine, mais n’apparaît jamais au grand jour. 34 ans, créatif, c’est lui qui amène les idées pour les actions à mener par les « féministes » aux seins nus . La pose au poing levé permet par exemple au spectateur de façonner à peu de frais dans son esprit un réflexe de pensée conditionné indiquant que les Femen sont le synonyme de liberté (poing levé) et de libertaire (seins nus). L’idéologie du Capitalisme de la séduction en somme, comme le confirmerait le philosophe Michel Clouscard.
Ceux qui ont rencontré Viktor Sviatski décrivent quelqu’un doté d’une personnalité dominante, qui n’hésite pas d’exiger à ses activistes de se mettre au régime. Anna Houtsol déclare quant à elle qu’il s’agit juste d’un ami et dédaigne en parler publiquement. Si la présence d’un homme aux côtés des Femen a quelque chose de contradictoire avec leur posture médiatique, le mutisme autour de lui vient renforcer les zones d’ombre qui entourent ce mouvement. Leurs sources de financement restent en effet assez floues. De plus, leurs actions tous azimuts rendent perplexe quant à leur véritable raison d’être (en plus de porter de graves atteintes médiatiques aux intérêts du puissant lobby des soutiens-gorge).
Malgré tout, les Femen s’exportent. Des activistes ukrainiennes forment maintenant des recrues en France, en Allemagne et bientôt au Brésil. Il alors devient évident que les Femen sont émancipées de tout, sauf du mondialisme patriarcal des banques.
[Note de l'Editeur: Afin de ne pas faire plus de publicité à ces Putes ukrainiennes (financées par Soros et l'Oligarchie Mondialiste) qu'elles n'en méritent, nous avons volontairement choisi la photo des Femen détournée par Zeon. Quenellement Vôtre !]
Mercredi 6 mars, Charlie Hebdo sort un numéro spécial Femen qui propose (« en exclusivité en France ») le manifeste Femen, 4 pages rédigées par les Femen (Femen Hebdo), un entretien avec Inna Shevchenko, la fondatrice du groupuscule exilée en France, mais aussi un article de Jean-Yves Camus intitulé : « La France en retard sur la parité par rapport à l’Afrique » et un autre de Zineb, une « sociologue des religions franco-marocaine » dénonçant « l’escroquerie du féminisme islamique ».
« Un numéro étendard à brandir dans les réunions de familles, au bureau ou dans la rue, habillé ou seins nus, pour comprendre l’esprit Femen et emmerder les machos ! » promet Charlie Hebdo qui ne révèle pas qui finance le mouvement.
Mardi soir à 22h45, France 2 diffuse un documentaire orienté et complaisant («militant ») sur les Femen réalisé par Caroline Fourest et Nadia El Fani, intitulé Nos seins, nos armes. L’organisation catholique traditionnaliste Civitas, qui diffuse sur son blog une photo du PDG de France Télévisions aux côtés d’Inna Shevchenko et de Caroline Fourest, appelle à faire pression sur la chaîne publique pour qu’elle renonce à le diffuser.
Tout ceci pose la question des relations entre les Femen et certains médias. Le 24 février dernier, quand elles ont tenté de sauter sur Silvio Berlusconi, les Femen ont pu approcher il Cavaliere… grâce à des cartes de journaliste Associated Press. L’OJIM a contacté le bureau italien d’AP qui a affirmé que les cartes étaient des fausses. L’AP n’envisagerait aucune action contre le groupe.
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
Those who count the votes decide everything.
Follow the bouncing ball on the criminal corruption ruse of your USA votes.
1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?
2.) Obama outsorced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.
3.) But recently, SOE software has now been sold to a company named SCYTL, owned by George Soros, headquartered in Spain.
4.) The votes will go to SCYTL, the question becomes as to WHY Must local votes for each precinct will be downloaded to SCYTL’s main server – leaving no TRACEABLE record of how many, and what votes were scored! Which of course means that said votes will be MERGED; and any discrepancies at lower levels will be IMPOSSIBLE to track. 5.) But wait, it gets murkier: SCYTL is shadow owned by Pere Valles, a former CEO of Global Net; who just HAPPENS to have been a maximum level contributor to the Obama Campaign in 2008. Not surprisingly, Valles is also has contacts with Media Matters, a communication consortium owned by: George Soros.
6.) Now the bad news: according to the “Black Box” voting site, this centralizes one “middleman” access point for over 525 voting jurisdictions: (AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. – and growing).
7. If this is allowed to stand, it means that as local election results funnel through SOE’s computers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the main servers for SOE essentially get “first look” at results, AND the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.
8.) This raises an unending amount of troubling questions:
a.) How can a company that is located in Spain owned by George Soros, be responsible for verifying the results of American elections? How can the integrity of the vote be guaranteed, when votes are transmitted in digital form, with NO paperwork backup to check for discrepancies?
b.) It has been questioned since the inception of the voting machine how to preclude tampering with said machines; yet no answers are forthcoming. How easily can the software that controls these devices be programmed to “count” erroneously?
c.) Even worse, with SCYTL in charge, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of resonsibility. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, nor chain of custody, or the count.
[EDITOR'S NOTE: Further to yesterday's episode: an article on Amnesty's LiveWire blog asking UN Qatar israHell and US to stop arming the opposition, here is an article from March 2012. The following article proves what we were saying yesterday - to those who seemed happy to have Amnesty speaking the truth - that Amnesty is an empire tool and will always act according to empire's agenda. As we foresaw, Amnesty came up and said it was hacked]
The former US Ambassador to Syria, Robert S. Ford, presented part of the keynote address during the 2012 Amnesty International Annual General Meeting, held in Denver, Colorado between March 30th and April 1st. While AI made sure to keep the appearance of Ford under wraps from the public, it was mentioned by supporting media prior to the event. As well, Ford was listed in the program as a keynote speaker during the second day of the conference. Among others, AI’s annual conference also featured “progressive” radio host Amy Goodman.
Between 2004 and 2006 Ford worked closely under US Ambassador John Negroponte at the US embassy in Baghdad. During his previous tenure as ambassador to Honduras, Negroponte devised and implemented the policy of funding and training death squads to combat leftist insurgencies in the region. In Iraq, Negroponte charged Ford with a similar task: funding and training militias to carry out sectarian violence aimed at a largely Sunni resistance. In late January of 2011, during the same time that the first protests in the country occurred, Ford arrived in Syria to serve as the newly-appointed ambassador. Since, violence has racked the country and Ford has been accused of recruiting and arming foreign fighters from the region to destabilize and possibly overthrow the Syrian government. Continue reading
The purpose of all this mobilization and campaigns and huge financing is NOT of course to boycott the Israeli dates that will not need by itself so much effort and exertion . The purpose under this attractive label is to go around the achievements of the Armed Resistance against Israel and its numerous victories over the Israeli state, and to channel the Arab and Palestinian capacities away from the support due to this successful Resistance, towards promoting a mere boycott of exchange of goods and investments in a state threatened- in its own existence- by the victorious Resistance of Hizbullah and Hamas .
There is nothing the world order would not do in order to curb such Resistance, for this reason the Arab Spring was created and the assault on Syria launched ; the first in order to divert the Arab attention from the stunning achievements of the Resistance by involving them in internal differences and conflicts , and the second in order to undermine the great supporter of the Resistance that is Syria . The BDS movement falls within the same range and exploits the great need of Palestinians and Arabs and their friends to support the cause by investing this need in the service of Israel, far from where it should be oriented and directed
The ravaging of Africa will still proceed as scheduled.
by Tony Cartalucci ( Land Destroyer )
March 17, 2012 - Over the past week, as Invisible Children and their corporate sponsors performed desperate damage control, ties between the alleged “charity” and the US State Department, Wall Street speculator George Soros and his Open Society Institute, and a myriad of corporate-funded foundations began surfacing and spreading just as quickly as their documentary Kony 2012 rose to fame.
Perhaps most importantly, the term AFRICOM began gaining wider notoriety as did the mission of AFRICOM - the neo-colonial plundering of all of Africa. And as this single backfiring propaganda stunt threatened to unhinge a continent-spanning corporate-military industrial campaign, the plug was abruptly pulled with news of Invisible Children’s director Jason Russell being arrested for lewd behavior in public. Continue reading
Kony 2012, hyped on the backs of celebrities and do-gooders, is revealed for what it is– a propaganda salvo for a continent wide invasion of Africa. Yes, the mantra War is Peace is once again drumming U.S. soldiers into further conflict.
Research makes clear that KONY is a sophisticated psy-op to muster popular support for what is, in reality, nothing more than a geostrategic positioning vis-a-vis China for oil and mineral resources, as well as an effort to legitimize the U.S. military’s AFRICOM unit in the region through newly-branded “humanitarian” interventions.
It is not only War in the name of “Peace,” but an attempt to empower the International Criminal Court under the influence of NGOs and other related globalist corporate interests.
Nobel Peace Prize “winner” Barack Obama has already deployed 100 special forces troops to the central African region back in October 2011, and a resolution in Congress– on the heels of KONY 2012′s viral views of at lest 80 million– seeks to send more forces there for an all out invasion on the pretext of hunting down a shadowy warlord with less blood on his hands than an average African despot.
Top celebrities vying for greater power including CFR member and UN goodwill ambassadorAngelina Jolie, actor George Clooney, media baroness Oprah Winfrey, as well as Africa-obsessed Bill Gates and Bono, have all come out in front of this issue.
But behind KONY’s apparent urgency are the usual suspects, the hidden hands behind uprisings and color revolutions including the Arab Spring and Libyan invasion. A key World Net Daily investigation makes clear that George Soros and his International Crisis Group, headed by former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, and the likes of Samantha Power, a key member of Obama’s National Security Council advancing “humanitarian” causes, have significantly framed and shaped the manufactured crisis surrounding the now-famous head of the Lord’s Resistance Army. Like Libya, the Responsibility to Protect doctrine– created and advanced by Soros, Samantha Power and other power players– gives the impetus for intervention in the conflict. Groups like Invisible Children, who produced KONY 2012, are pawns in their game.
February 5, 2012 – Reuters reported, “Tunisia “to withdraw recognition” of Syria government,” and specifically that newly appointed Tunisian president Moncef Marzouki made the announcement on his Facebook page. Reuters also notes “Tunisia’s decision to sever ties with Damascus carries moral weight because the north African country’s revolution last year started off the “Arab Spring” upheavals which later spread throughout the Middle East, including to Syria.” What Reuters of course fails to mention is that the “Arab Spring” was engineered years in advance, planned, funded, and directed by the US State Department, with Moncef Marzouki a direct recipient on record of such support which ultimately paved his way from obscurity to now president of the North African nation.
The US Put Moncef Marzouki of Tunisia into Power
Last December, the BBC hailed Tunisia’s assembly and their election of a new president in their article, “Tunisian activist, Moncef Marzouki, named president.” What the BBC predictably failed to mention was that Marzouki’s organization, the Tunisian League for Human Rights, was a US National Endowment for Democracy and George Soros Open Society-funded International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) member organization.
Photo: Tunisia’s new “president,” Moncef Marzouki, a veteran Western collaborator whose last two decades of political activity have been supported and subsidized by the US government and US corporate-financier funded foundations.
It was earlier reported in “Soros Celebrates the Fall of Tunisia,” that Marzouki was named “interim-president” of Tunisia and that the myriad of NGOs and opposition organizations that worked with him to overthrow the government of Tunisia were fully subsidized and backed by the US government and US corporate-funded foundations.
Marzouki, who spent two decades in exile in Paris, France, was also founder and head of the Arab Commission for Human Rights, a collaborating institution with the US NED World Movement for Democracy (WMD) including for a “Conference on Human Rights Activists in Exile” and a participant in the WMD “third assembly” alongside Marzouki’s Tunisian League for Human Rights, sponsored by NED, Soros’ Open Society, and USAID.
Marzouki, along with his Libyan counterpart Abdurrahim el-Keib, formally of the Petroleum Institute, sponsored by British Petroleum (BP), Shell, France’s Total, the Japan Oil Development Company, and the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, makes for the second Western proxy installed into power either by covert sedition or overt military aggression, during the US-engineered “Arab Spring.”
Now, it is quite clear how Marzouki is reciprocating the foreign-backed plot that thrust him into power – complete servitude toward Wall Street and London’s foreign policy in backing this very same foreign-funded gambit now playing out in Syria.
Syria has been slated for regime change since as early as 1991. In 2002, then US Under Secretary of State John Bolton added Syria to the growing “Axis of Evil.” It would be later revealed that Bolton’s threats against Syria manifested themselves as covert funding and support for opposition groups inside of Syria spanning both the Bush and Obama administrations.
In an April 2011 CNN article, acting State Department spokesman Mark Toner stated, “We’re not working to undermine that [Syrian] government. What we are trying to do in Syria, through our civil society support, is to build the kind of democratic institutions, frankly, that we’re trying to do in countries around the globe. What’s different, I think, in this situation is that the Syrian government perceives this kind of assistance as a threat to its control over the Syrian people.”
Toner’s remarks came after the Washington Post released cables indicating the US has been funding Syrian opposition groups since at least 2005 and continued until today.
In an April 2011 AFP report, Michael Posner, the assistant US Secretary of State for Human Rights and Labor, stated that the “US government has budgeted $50 million in the last two years to develop new technologies to help activists protect themselves from arrest and prosecution by authoritarian governments.”
The report went on to explain that the US “organized training sessions for 5,000 activists in different parts of the world. A session held in the Middle East about six weeks ago gathered activists from Tunisia, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon who returned to their countries with the aim of training their colleagues there,” (emphasis added). Posner would add, “They went back and there’s a ripple effect.” That ripple effect of course is the “Arab Spring,” and in Syria’s case, the impetus for the current unrest threatening to unhinge the nation and invite in foreign intervention.”