US Refuses To Admit Checkmate By Russia And Syria, Redirects Purpose Of Military Incursion

Admits regime change intention

By Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

Following up on this morning’s shocking “appeasement” turn of events by Russia and Syria, the White House has promptly fired back in the only way it knows: digging in deeper:

The White House ✔ @WhiteHouse

“Failing to respond brings us closer to the day when terrorists might gain and use chemical weapons against Americans.” —@AmbassadorRice
7:07 PM – 9 Sep 2013

The Comedy continues:

The White House ✔ @WhiteHouse

“We have seen what happens when the world fails to respond to horrific abuses on the scale we saw in Damascus.” —@AmbassadorRice on #Syria
7:38 PM – 9 Sep 2013

Yes – in Rwanda, Somalia and all those tens of other conflicts the US never got involved in because Qatari/Saudi petrodollar/gas interests were not involved.

With the mainstream media proclaiming last night’s Charlie Rose interview with Assad “propaganda”, the following headlines from a speech by national security advisors Susan Rice will frighten even the most “Miley Cyrus”-numb American:

RICE SAYS OPENING DOOR TO CHEMICAL WEAPONS THREATENS U.S.

RICE SAYS CHEMICAL WEAPONS COULD BE USED EVEN WITHIN THE U.S.

RICE SAYS U.S. ALLIES BECOME `TEMPTING TARGETS’ IF NO RESPONSE

RICE SAYS ASSAD ATTACK THREATENS GLOBAL SECURITY, U.S. INCLUDED

We can only imagine the ‘score’ underlying her words, which are getting scarier and louder with every verbal escalation…

RICE SAYS SYRIA UNLEASHED `HELLISH CHAOS’ IN CHEMICAL ATTACK

and an ominous Carmina Burana ‘drum beat’, crescendoing with:

RICE SAYS NOT RESPONDING MAY EMBOLDEN N KOREA, IRAN, TERRORISTS

So, it would appear, that a Syrian strike is no longer about preventing Assad from using weapons, as was the story until now, but deterring others from doing what Assad may or may not have done.

At the end of the day, the US will refuse to accept checkmate by being humiliated by grandmaster Putin in the world arena: it seems the decision is already made:

RICE SAYS U.S. WOULD LIKE UN BACKING BUT IT WON’T HAPPEN

And finally, here is the admission after all. As expected, the whole point of this entire frace was to topple Assad and replace him with a pro-Syria, pro-Qatar, anti-Russia regime:

White House Live ✔ @WHLive

Rice: “Our overarching goal is to end the underlying conflict through a negotiated, political transition in which Assad leaves power” #Syria
7:27 PM – 9 Sep 2013

And if we were Iran we would be worried. Very worried. A false flag in which Tehran attacks Israel is coming any second:

White House Live ✔ @WHLive

Rice: Limited strikes “will make clear to Assad and his allies—Hezbollah & Iran—that they should not test the resolve of the United States.”
7:32 PM – 9 Sep 2013

BENGHAZI-GATE – RICE: ‘I LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BECAUSE OF INTEL.’ (REALLY?)

[Editor’s Note: The Narrative about Benghazi were Edited to remove the fact mentioning a planned Terrorist attack in order to follow the White House and Secretary of State version : The ‘story about the spontaneous riots’ due to the youtube anti-muslim film. This False version, this LIE was sustained by the Secretary of State, the Defense Secretary and the President until after the U.S. elections. CIA Director David Petraeus confirmed during House Hearings that it was not the CIA who edited The Narrative. It could only have been done by DHS NAPOLITANO under order of OBAMA.]

Susan Rice Lays All Blame on Intel Community for Her Misleading the American People

20121123-074520.jpg

BY DANIEL HALPER, The Weekly Standard

Ambassador Susan Rice has finally explained, in her opinion, why she misled the country about what happened during the September 11 terror attack against Americans in Benghazi, Libya. According to Rice, all the blame should be given to the intelligence community for her misleading comments made five days after the attack, since she was just repeating what they had told her.

A reporter asked, the American ambassador to the United Nations, “Ambassador Rice, would you explain your view of the controversy concerning your comments about Benghazi? And have—is Senator McCain fair in what he has said?”

“As a senior US diplomat, I agreed to a White House request to appear on the Sunday shows to talk about the full range of national security issues of the day, which at that time were primarily and particularly the protests that were enveloping and threatening many diplomatic facilities—American diplomatic facilities—around the world and Iran’s nuclear program. The attack on Benghazi—on our facilities in Benghazi—was obviously a significant piece of this,” Rice explains.

Continue reading

Barack Obama’s Benghazi LIES-LIES-LIES-LIES-LIES…

FIVE TIMES, at the direction of the Obama White House, did U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice appear on the Sunday news programs days after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack that left four Americans, including a United States ambassador, dead.

Ulsterman Report

Media are now indicating Barack Obama was briefed my military intelligence BEFORE Susan Rice was sent out by the Obama White House to spread the lie that the Benghazi attacks was the result of an unknown YouTube video and not terrorism.

Barack Obama himself then went to the United Nations days after Susan Rice’s lies, to spread that same lie that the YouTube video was at fault. The Obama administration refused to use the term terrorism, and both Rice and Barack Obama were repeating the lie that al-Qaida had been destroyed, when in fact the actual evidence stongly suggested an al-Qaida affiliate had just murdered an American ambassador.

20121118-162709.jpg
EXCERPT: (via Washington Guardian)

President told within 72 hours Benghazi attack linked to al-Qaida extremists

U.S. intelligence told President Barack Obama and senior administration officials within 72 hours of the Benghazi tragedy that the attack was likely carried out by local militia and other armed extremists sympathetic to al-Qaida in the region, officials directly familiar with the information told the Washington Guardian on Friday.

Based on electronic intercepts and human intelligence on the ground, the early briefings after the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya identified possible organizers and participants. Most were believed to be from a local Libyan militia group called Ansar al-Sharia that is sympathetic to al-Qaida, the official said, while a handful of others was linked to a direct al-Qaida affiliate in North Africa known as AQIM.

Most of the details affirming al-Qaida links were edited or excluded from the unclassified talking points used by Rice in appearances on news programs the weekend after the attack, Continue reading

Benghazi-gate: Lame Cherry right again about Jill Kelley

By Lame Cherry

My children, who was it but your popular girl who told you to stop looking at the mammoth mammaries of Jill Kelley and start focusing on her honeypot Lebanese associations in SOMEONE WAS PROTECTING HER FROM INSIDE THE OBAMA REGIME.
That is a statement and not a question for the monkeys in the Ulsterman zoo.
Now 24 hours later is the Drudge featured breaking story of Jill Kelley was eating our or is it eaten out at the White House three times this year.

CIA’s Talking Points Were ‘Edited’ to Play Down Terrorism…
Director Knew Immediately Al Qaeda-Linked Group Responsible for Benghazi…
… ELEMENT REMOVED FROM SUSAN RICE’S TALKING POINTS
FLASHBACK: What she said…

Lawmakers shown video of envoy being dragged out…

BETRAEUS!

SOCIALITE WHO BROUGHT DOWN PETRAEUS DINED AT WHITE HOUSE THREE TIMES THIS YEAR…

The reason Jill Kelley phoned the FBI and the FBI jumped for her, was the intimate connection to B. Hussein Obama. As stated from the start, exclusively only from this blog, exactly according to the Kremlin protocols and the same scenario J. Edgar Hoover utilized, Jill Kelley has all the stretch marks of a minder which infests regimes in intimate data mining to keep tabs on powerful people, blackmail them and to extract information from them.

This blog broke this story again by God’s Grace and the reality is the media is still catching up.

Goodness people, we have a war on terror, involving Muslims and Middle Eastern associates. Obama has good and bad terrorists. Jill Kelley is all over a top security hub and is attached to powerful men on the right in Patraeus and Rubio, and she is sitting down to dinner with Barack Obama…..all in being Middle Eastern in heritage.
Where do you think her loyalties lie and with her family’s massive debt bills, who is keeping the creditors at bay…..as Patraeus is showing up in court to defend Jill Kelley’s sister in a nasty custody hearing….after being fondled under the table.

In 1970, Director J. Edgar Hoover would have arrested this entire bunch, and been banging on 1600 Penn Avenue with warrants to find out the connection of Lebanese Kelley to Lebanese Obama Osseiran, as the connection now looms in the reality, the top man at CIA and top for Europe have been removed due to the machinations of two Lebanese inside America during a war on terror involving these people’s namesakes.
Continue reading

Petraeus ‘Knew Almost Immediately’ Al Qaeda-Linked Group Responsible for Benghazi

20121117-133815.jpg

By Daniel Halper, Weekly Standard

David Petraeus is going to tell members of Congress that he “knew almost immediately after the September 11th attack, that the group Ansar al Sharia, the al Qaeda sympathizing group in Libya was responsible for the attacks,” CNN reports.

In his closed door meeting on the Hill, “[Petraeus] will also say he had his own talking points separate from U.N. ambassador Susan Rice. [Hers] came from somewhere other in the administration than his direct talking points,” Barbara Starr of CNN reports, referencing a source close to Petraeus.

The former CIA director will move to further himself from comments that didn’t accurately characterize the terror attack that Rice made 5 days after on national television shows.

“When he looks at what Susan Rice said,” CNN reports, “here is what Petraeus’s take is, according to my source. Petraeus developed some talking points laying it all out. those talking points as always were approved by the intelligence community. But then he sees Susan Rice make her statements and he sees input from other areas of the administration. Petraeus — it is believed — will tell the committee he is not certain where Susan Rice got all of her information.”

[Editor’s Note: Guess from Whom Susan Rice got her info to describe the Attack on Benghazi as spontaneous riots due to the Anti-Muslims Film ? It could have only come from Obama as He did say the same on his press conference after the attack but also in his interview to 60 minutes.]

Benghazigate: All the President’s Men

Seraphic Secret

The magician makes you look in one direction so you miss his sleight-of-hand. In this way, you are distracted, and then made the fool.

Barack Hussein Obama’s regime is thrilled that the media are feasting on the “thousands of e-mails” between General David Petraeus and Paula Broadwell, between Paula Broadwell and Jill Kelley, between Jill Kelley and General John Allen, and, finally, a shirtless photos sent by an FBI agent to who-knows-how-many women.

And you thought this behavior ceased in high school.

It’s all there: powerful men, powerful bimbettes, adultery, jealousy, sex, lies, and e-mails.

But: this is a magic trick, a political sleight-of-hand. Obama and his hacks held back the Petraeus scandal because had it been revealed before voters cast their ballots, the vote might have gone to Romney.

In any case, this is all just sound and fury. It’s the magician distracting us, the nation, from Benghazi.

We have been told that Petraeus cannot testify because he’s no longer director of the CIA.

We’re also told that Hillary Clinton can’t testify because she’s busy in Australia.

Okay, simple: subpoena Petraeus, Clinton, Rice, and every member of the Obama administration who is suddenly too busy, or conveniently out of a job, to testify.

They can either testify or take the Fifth.

True, you cannot subpoena Obama, but all the others have a moral and legal obligation to step forward and tell us what they knew, when they knew it, and what they did when American soil and American citizens came under attack and were massacred.

Further: We need to know what President Obama knew, when he knew it, and what he did as commander-in-chief when IslamoNazis attacked an American consulate.

We already know that Obama and members of his administration lied when they said that a mob protesting an obscure video no one ever saw got out of hand and attacked the Benghazi consulate.

Obama and his people knew, that very night, that the massacre was a well-coordinated attack by an Al Qaeda affiliate.

Congress needs to start knocking off all the president’s men, one by one, until the wall around Obama starts to crumble, as it inevitably will, and either Obama tells the truth to the American people or he is impeached for dereliction of duty.

It’s that simple, that complicated.

Libya: US Blocks Russian UN Resolution of Bani Walid Violence

The United States has blocked a draft statement, proposed by Russia, on the resolution of violence in the Libyan town of Bani Walid, which has been under siege for weeks. The statement called for a peaceful solution to the conflict.

Russia’s envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin said the move “can’t be serious,”reminding the American delegation of the deadly attack in Benghazi that claimed the lives of four US diplomats in September.

“Blocking a draft statement that called to solve the country’s political problems without violence is very strange,” Churkin said. “This is a case when it is difficult to explain the US delegation’s actions in rational terms.”

The statement drafted by Russia on Bani Walid called on the Libyan authorities “to take urgent steps to resolve the conflict by peaceful means and to preserve the rights of all Libyan citizens.” It also expressed concern about the significant escalation of violence in and around the city of Bani Walid in recent days. 

Lawrence Freeman, from news magazine Executive Intelligence Review says the US will block any peaceful solution to the ongoing violence in Libya, because stability in the region is not in its interests. Continue reading

US Ambassador In Veiled Terror Threat to Syria’s Assad

US Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice reacted to yesterday’s deadly bombings in Damascus by issuing a chilling and thinly veiled threat that NATO-backed terrorists would carry out more attacks unless President Bashar al-Assad stepped down.

US Ambassador In Veiled Terror Threat to Syrias Assad u8 Susan Rice

By Paul Joseph Watson, PrisonPlanet.com

Following the attacks, which targeted the Military Intelligence Centre and killed mostly Syrian security force members, Rice seized upon the carnage to proclaim, “The longer Assad clings to power, the greater the risk of destabilization in Syria and throughout the region.”

Although Rice’s words were subtle in tone, the message she sent to Assad was clear – relinquish power or the terror attacks will continue.

Instead of condemning the bombings, Rice actually hinted that more would take place until the NATO powers had achieved their political agenda of regime change.

In a subsequent tweet she added, “Bombings also remind us of the urgent need for a political solution in Syria before it is too late.”

And just what is that “political solution”? According to Rice herself in a statement made hours before the attacks, the solution is “Increasing the pressure on the Assad regime and on Assad himself to step down.”

So effectively, Rice all but lauded the bombings as a tool to dispense with the UN cease fire and accelerate the “political solution” for NATO – the mission to topple Assad.

Rice’s complete failure to condemn the horrific attacks and her subtle gesture of actually using them to threaten more attacks on the Syrian government is abhorrent. Far from behaving likes a stateswoman, Rice’s rhetoric has more in common with Osama Bin Laden.

Continue reading