MH370 Revisited Part 2: Protecting US Defense Technology

image

By Yoichi Shimatsu
World Exclusive to Rense
4-13-14

KUALA LUMPUR – Several blogs are using dubious photo analysis to question the credibility of Philip Wood, the American aboard MH370 whose i-Phone message showed that the plane had been hijacked, its passengers detained by “unknown military personnel” and the detention center to be on the Diego Garcia military base. The secrecy surrounding Wood’s background does not mean that he and his fiance Sarah Bajc are “crisis actors”. On the contrary, the facts point to his status as a tech-security agent for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).
Across Asia, the DIA has a reputation for professionalism far surpassing the CIA’s armchair scholars, narcissist neophytes and diplomatic cocktail freeloaders. Wood fits the DIA profile to a tee, being computer savvy, knowledgeable about defense-related technology, careful in maintaining his cover at IBM, silent about his military record and physically tough.
The fact that the Israelis confined and likely murdered a DIA agent reveals the extreme desperation that compelled the theft of America’s most advanced defense technology. The midair hijack aimed at abducting 20 computer-technology experts with Freescale Semiconductor exposes the outlaw mentality of a rogue state that holds its closest ally and benefactor in utter contempt. Simply put, Israel has emerged as America’s most implacable enemy and all the more dangerous because it poses as an ally and friend.
Israel resorted to stealing the Freescale Kinetis KL02 and KL03 techology, rather than waiting to pay for licensing rights, because the micro-controller is urgently needed for the upcoming military assault on Iran. The widening divide between the State Department and Israel over Iran policy, particularly the question of a bombing campaign, put the hawkish and fanatic Netyanhu government onto a “go it alone” warpath against Tehran.
Since it is logistically impossible for the Israel Air Force to fly long-distance sorties against Iranian military sites without control over Syrian airspace, the only feasible alternative to aerial bombing is to unleash hordes of lightweight ultra-small robotic weapons that can fly and crawl into underground military facilities.
The KL series microcontroller units (MCU) are the brains for these tiny self-guided weapons, whose sensors can find pathways through air ducts, power conduits and plumbing pipes to attack electronic controls and incapacitate personnel with nerve gas or biowarfare agents. When launched from Dolphin submarines under the cover of nightfall, there is no effective defense against an army of tiny ninja robots.
The one person who stood in the way of Israel’s devious plans was Philip Wood, who was not a crisis actor, as suggested in a disinformation campaign, but instead an American patriot. Without his courageous efforts to organize resistance against the hostage-takers, the Israelis would have gotten away with the perfect crime. Now, thanks to his sense of duty and personal sacrifice, the perpetrators stand naked before the world as the despicable thugs they really are. The test of American honor rides on whether the White House or Congress dares to defy Israeli treachery by acknowledging Phil Wood with a posthumous medal.

Get Off of My Cloud
Texas resident Wood was, on the surface, a quiet and unassuming computer memory expert with IBM, following his father’s career path. Oddly, no details of his work on cloud computing and computer security in Dallas-Fort Worth are listed on his Linked-in page.
The omission of a local client list is due to the fact that Big Blue’s largest customer in Fort Worth is USAF-Lockheed Plant 4 at Carswell military airfield. Plant 4 is where the Air Force and its aerospace contractors install, test and improve the aviation electronics for America’s most advanced fighters, including the F-22, F-35 and F-18, along with the navigation systems for drones, missiles and smart bombs. Computer security against hackers and human-based industrial espionage is, therefore, all-important to protecting American defense-technology edge against its many adversaries and friendly rivals.
The Air Force upgraded its longtime partnership with IBM computer services with a 2010 master contract to transfer its production data, including weapons design and personnel matters, to a cloud computing platform with strong security. Even well-protected servers in any lab or office can be hacked with relative ease with newer software. Cloud computing, in contrast, establishes a virtual network protected by the latest firewall software even before its public release. The network is constantly monitored to determine user behavior and to track down any attempts to break into unauthorized areas.
The other advantage of the Cloud is its flexibility, moving as it can across different computer nodes. If a major node is disrupted or destroyed by a virus attack, terrorist bombing or a nuclear strike, the data network simply moves onto other computers in safer locations. Therefore, in event of a nuclear war, America’s command-and-control system will survive intact to deliver a precision counterstrike with its remaining arsenal.

Called to Kuala Lumpur
After much of Plant 4, with all its components, came under cloud protection, Wood was transferred to Kuala Lumpur and Beijing following an IBM contract signing with Freescale Semicondutor.
The Austin-headquartered firm, a spinoff of Motorola, is heavily dependent on Asian programmers, with their excellent design skills, mathematical prowess, lower salaries and persistence at quality control. This is why the world’s smallest MCUs were designed and perfected at the Freescale plant in Petaling Jaya, on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur.
The creation of the KL series prompted top defense-technology experts to assign watchdogs over Freescale’s Asian operations. In November 2013, Joanne Maguire with Lockheed was appointed to the Freescale board of directors. Her career record shows her to be a veteran defense-tech executive as vice president of Lockheed, a member of the national Defense Technology commission, and a director of the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, a cutting-edge weapons research center in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
At the same moment, Phil Wood was appointed as fulltime technology manager with IBM Malaysia. For the first time in his career, he was given the executive privilege of having a public life and personal freedom, which was disclosed mainly through his courtship of Beijing-based Sarah Bajc. Besides their late-life romance, the couple “covered the bases” of high-tech security, he in the defense-related sector and she in the civilian corporate economy. A wedding could only increase their professional synergy. Their pre-nuptial plan was to set up house in Kuala Lumpur. Instead, their relationship proved to be tragic, cut short by an Israeli special forces team on Diego Garcia.

Continue reading

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Remote Control Hijacking Technology is Public Knowledge for at Least 15 Years

The fact that Malaysia Airlines flight 370 was taken over remote-controlled by rogue U.S.-government / U.S. military elements continues to be dismissed by a growing number of people and media outlets – because a person would actually have to be on board to hijack any plane – even though that technology is proven to have been developed and therefore exists.

MARCH 17, 2014

Field McConnell’s (Abel Danger) Interview About Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System

It was announced in 2007 that by 2009 all commercial jets from Boeing would have this UAS installed, that’s already 5 years ago.

Again, that AWACS, even a remote-controlled version (AEW UAV), is perfectly capable of assisting in the remote-controlled takeover of any commercial jet by jamming radars and satellites is not a wild guess, its one of its standard applications. This is already known for many years, even by folks not affiliated with the military. It’s even been published numerous times in specialized publications. Even if you never read any of those you can still find this information in mainstream outlets online. The information is so common that it was already published for the public in at least 1986.

Herebelow is the chronology of the announcement of the BUAP: Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot, which allows remote controlled take over of any commercial airplane equipped with this system. Boeing already confirmed in 2007 that all its jets were to be fitted with this system. Note that Airbus has a similar equipment on all its jets.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2001

“Bush Announces New Airline Security Measures:

…The president said new security measures would also dramatically increase the number of plainclothes federal marshals on airplanes, give $500 million to developing enhanced cockpit security and enable air traffic controllers to take over a distressed aircraft and land it by remote control.” – PBS

APRIL 1999

Airborne Early Warning Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

“Several strengths and weakness exist for the AEW UAV concept. The first strength involves cost. UAVs with only the “gather data” and “transmit data” elements (see Figure 2) would be relatively more inexpensive than the AWACS system—even though many would be needed since each would be relatively smaller/lighter and would probably lack the power needed to extend radar range as far as the traditional platform. Second, either Sub-concept 1 or 2 could 27 provide extended coverage by extending the AEW platforms’ orbit areas across the FEBA without placing an extremely expensive platform with a large crew in jeopardy. Third, with Sub-concept 2 (the hive principle), the sensor element of the high value asset becomes dispersed, which makes knocking out the “data gathering” function harder to achieve. On the other hand, there are weaknesses. The more capabilities added to the AEW UAV, the larger and more costly the platform becomes (Examples of additional capabilities are: ESM, remotely-controlled maintenance/optimization of mission systems, remote piloting capability, and extended range/endurance/altitude).” – AU/ACSC

DECEMBER 4, 2006

“Boeing Wins Patent on Uninterruptible Autopilot System

Boeing is, of course, not the first autopilot technology in existence, but this one has been designed with counterterrorism first and foremost in mind. Not only is it ‘uninterruptible’ — so that even a tortured pilot cannot turn it off — but it can be activated remotely via radio or satellite by government agencies.” – HSNW

Continue reading

The Truthseeker: Leaked US Regime Change Manual, Admits Ukraine’s its ‘Playbook’

Happy Xmas Ukraine! Openly pro-Nazi rioters ripping up paving stones for weapons and driving bulldozers at people get sweets from America’s Asst. Secretary of State, the surprisingly long list of countries where the US attempts regime change under cover of ‘human rights’; and George Clooney becomes the Pentagon’s sexy new weapon.

Seek truth from facts with Humanitarian Imperialism author Jean Bricmont, UN Human Rights Rapporteur Richard Falk, political analyst Richard Becker, Asia Times’ Pepe Escobar, On Immoral Interventionism author Gilad Atzmon, and ‘worth 500,000 dead kids’ Madeleine Albright.

Annan: Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey supplied Syrian opposition with money and arms

Vienna, (SANA) Former UN Secretary General and former international envoy to Syria Kofi Annan said Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have supplied the “Syrian opposition” with money and arms.

In an interview with the Austrian Die Presse newspaper, Annan noted that some regional and Western countries rejected the six-point plan which he presented for solving the crisis in Syria because they had differences with the Syrian leadership or with Iran, Russia and China, adding that those countries then formed the so-called “Friends of Syria” group.

He reiterated the need to solve the crisis in Syria by peaceful and political means, expressing his opposition to any form of military intervention.

Annan, who was appointed as UN Special Envoy to Syria in February 2012, highlighted that the Syrian government showed positive reaction to his efforts early in his mission with regard to declaring a limited ceasefire while the other parties rejected that step.

The former international envoy stressed that Iran must be part of the solution in Syria given its great capabilities that allow it to exert an influence in the region and play an objective role to end the crisis, pointing out that Saudi Arabia opposed any Iranian role as it views Tehran as a rival in the regional and international arena.

Annan underscored that what made the US President Barack Obama hesitant to launch any military action against Syria despite pressure by the Pentagon and the US’s Western and Gulf allies was because of the fact that the situation in Syria is totally different from Libya or any other country given its sensitive geopolitical position.

He said that belief matched his visions to end the crisis in Syria peacefully when he told everybody that there could not be a military solution to the “conflict” in Syria, adding that no full agreement on his proposals was reached at the UN Security Council, “and that was why I had to quit my mission as an international envoy to Syria”.

Annan quit his position as an envoy and informed the UN of his intention not to renew his mission, which lasted until August 31 of 2012.

Annan expressed regret that Austria withdrew its forces from the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) in the occupied Syrian Golan, considering that the withdrawal of some Western states’ forces from Golan reflects these countries’ lack of desire and indifference to solve the crisis in Syria.

Source: Sana

The Winners of The Ukraine Revolution: Austerity, Fascism, and the EU

image

By Brandon Turbeville, Activist Post

To anyone who had a passing knowledge of the nature of color revolutions and destabilization efforts in years past, the recent protests in Ukraine were an obvious example of foreign meddling in the domestic affairs of yet another Eastern European nation.
From the initial spates of violence coming largely from the direction of the protesters to the pro-EU and pro-IMF demands, it was clear from the very beginning that the Ukrainian people were being callously pulled back and forth between two world powers indifferent to any interests but their own.

These powers, the United States and Russia, have been covertly jockeying for more and more control over Ukraine, a strategic location for both countries, for the last several years. Yet, as the United States’ power and influence begins to wane and Russia’s begins to increase on the world stage, the risk of both powers clashing over Ukraine in a direct fashion becomes a bigger possibility by the day.

While tensions between the United States and Russia have escalated over the last three years through the Syrian crisis, Ukraine is more than a simple sphere-of-influence region for Russia. It is a sphere-of-influence region that borders the homeland. For this reason alone, the level of importance attributed to Ukraine by Russia is obviously higher than that of Syria in the long run.
Interestingly enough, it is for this same reason that the United States considers Ukraine such a vital sphere-of-influence nation as well. That is, the fact that Ukraine lies on the doorstep of Russia.

Although the reasons for considering Ukraine an extremely important part of the world by both the United States and Russia cannot simply be boiled down to that of a border issue, the fact remains that the potential for a direct collision between two world nuclear powers is a possibility if the meddling continues.
In the meantime, as the Ukrainian people are being used as battering rams for the will of world elites, they are quite clearly the guaranteed loser no matter what decision is made. With the recent success of the Western-backed color revolution, what is also clear is that the only winner in Ukraine is austerity, Fascism, the IMF, and, of course, the world elites. International bankers, as usual, are salivating over the coming feast that will come at the expense of the living standards of the Ukrainian people and the coffers of the Ukrainian government.

Even before a ruling government can be formed by the leading color revolutionary leaders Yatsenyuk, Klitschko, and other relevant agents of destabilization, the acting President, Oleksander Turchinov, is stating that European integration is a high priority of the new government. This, of course, means that Ukraine will soon move forward in becoming a full-fledged member in good standing of the new European Soviet known as the European Union.
In addition, leading contender for the post of Prime Minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and the Parliamentary leader of the Fatherland Party, is now calling on the rest of Parliament to immediately come to agreement on a new government so that Ukraine can now crawl to the International Monetary Fund for “emergency economic assistance.” As one may expect, the IMF has already declared that it will require harsh austerity measures and other “economic changes” in exchange for any aid to Ukraine.

<
The $15 billion bailout package provided by Russia to Ukraine in December has now been suspended, placing Ukraine in imminent danger of default. The Hryvna, the Ukrainian currency, has been sharply devalued and the country’s bond rating has been downgraded in such a dramatic fashion that Ukraine is no longer able to borrow on international markets. Foreign reserves have also dropped dramatically.
If conditions persist, Ukraine will soon no longer be able to pay public pensions and salaries.
Yet austerity is not the only result of the recent Ukrainian “revolution.” Subtle and even outright Fascism has come to dominate not only the demonstrations themselves but the relatively young “transitional” phase now taking place.
Indeed, this relatively new trend of Fascist rule was enunciated in a recent statement by Natalia Vitrenko of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine, a party that asserts its opposition to both the Orange Revolution installment of Yuschenko as well as the polices of Yanukovych.
Vitrenko first began by describing the nature of the movement used to oust Yanukovych by pointing out that many of the most powerful elements of the anti-Yanukovych movement, or Euromaidan, were indeed fascists and neo-Nazi’s. She stated,

< Washington and Brussels should hear our warnings. We hold them responsible for all they have done to transfer power to the political forces responsible for establishing this totalitarian Nazi regime in Ukraine, with the inevitable gross violation of the rights and freedoms of millions of our fellow citizens. 
The U.S. and EU should know that this power grab by political parties and movements including neo-Nazi forces (such as “Svoboda – Freedom” and “Right Sector”) , announced the implementation of a national revolution under the slogans “Ukraine for Ukrainians,” "Glory to the nation – death to enemies," "Muscovite tools and Communists to the gallows!" and others. 
Starting on February 22, this new government must assume all responsibility throughout Ukraine for the violation of the rights and freedoms of citizens.

Vitrenko then went on to discuss the events currently unfolding in Ukraine including the capture of government buildings as well as political intimidation, force, beatings, shootings, and even lynchings of those seen as pro-government or opposed to the positions of the Western-backed fascists. Vitrenko states,

Continue reading

US ‘supports neo-Nazis’ group Svoboda in Ukraine: Investigative journalist

US investigative journalist Wayne Madsen says American officials complimented the opposition party of Svoboda in Ukraine that is a “neo-Nazis organization.”

“The American government supports neo-Nazis, but I just find it absolutely ironic that those who are neoconservative and pro-Israel are also supporting neo-Nazis who made a large portion of Ukrainian illegal government,” he told Press TV on Tuesday.

The most controversial element of the anti-government alliance in Ukraine is Svoboda.

The group is an extreme right-wing political party that not only has representation in parliament, but has been dubbed by its critics as a neo-Nazi organization.

During a press conference on Monday, White House press secretary Jay Carney refused questions about whom Washington recognized as the leader of Ukraine.

Ukrainian protesters forced President Viktor Yanukovych from the capital and installed Oleksandr Turchinov as the “interim president.”

Opposition leaders issued an arrest warrant for President Yanukovych, who has fled Kiev.

Carney said Yanukovych’s actions had “undermined his legitimacy,” adding he was “not actively leading his country.”

“This is what the problem is in Ukraine today. We have a non-functioning government. Russia does not recognize the legitimacy of that government,” Madsen said.

“He [Carney] knows what the situation is with neo-Nazis and Ukraine. He was a former Time magazine correspondent in Moscow and he’s traveled to Kiev. He knows the full situation but why he doesn’t prevail on President Obama to not recognize this illegitimate government in Kiev is beyond me,” he added.

Source: PressTV

Qui est derrière le coup d’État en Ukraine

Par Nicolas BOURGOIN

image

Acte 1

On se souvient sans doute de la « Révolution orange », largement médiatisée à l’Ouest. Viktor Ianoukovitch, le candidat proche de Vladimir Poutine, est élu président de l’Ukraine le 21 novembre 2004. Une série de manifestations suivent la proclamation des résultats. Organisées par le candidat malheureux, Viktor Iouchtchenko, financées par des milliardaires ukrainiens et des organisations américaines (voir ici), soutenues par de nombreux pays occidentaux dont les Etats-Unis (elles ont été financées à hauteur de 65 millions de dollars par l’administration Bush), elles prennent rapidement de l’ampleur et forcent le gouvernement à organiser un nouveau scrutin un mois plus tard. Entaché de nombreuses fraudes, il verra la victoire de Viktor Iouchtchenko et ouvre une période marquée par un rapprochement avec le camps occidental et l’OTAN mais aussi par une gouvernance calamiteuse gangrenée par la corruption. Les multiples malversations du « clan orange » (délits financiers, détournements de fonds, évasion fiscale, favoritisme) conduiront notamment Ioulia Timochenko, l’ex-Première ministre ukrainienne, derrière les barreaux. Le président sortant ne recueillera que 5,45 % des voix lors du scrutin de 2010. Rideau sur le premier acte de la « Révolution orange ».

Acte 2

Des milliers d’opposants pro-européens manifestent violemment suite au refus du président ukrainien en novembre dernier de signer un accord d’intégration avec l’UE, décision motivée par la lourdeur des “réformes structurelles” exigées en retour par les européens (privatisations massives, réduction drastique des dépenses de l’État et de l’emploi public, remise en cause de la protection sociale et du droit du travail) alors que le pays est économiquement affaibli, ainsi que par le souhait de donner la priorité aux relations économiques avec la Russie. Rappelons que c’est aussi sur la base de ce rapprochement avec la Russie que le président ukrainien a été élu. Loin d’être pacifiques, ces manifestations apparaissent comme des tentatives de déstabiliser le gouvernement, voire de le renverser (voir ici), des snipers israéliens sont même présents (voir ici). Elles sont soutenues par Ioulia Timochenko, égérie de la révolution orange, et par la quasi-totalité des classes politiques occidentales.

Certains manifestants sont affiliés à l’organisation d’extrême-droite Svoboda, violemment anti-russe, dont la plupart des membres sont armés (voir ici). Des saccages, de nombreuses déprédations sont commis dont la destruction d’une statue de Lénine (voir ici la déclaration à ce sujet du Parti Communiste d’Ukraine).

Des catapultes géantes sont même montées pour l’occasion et utilisées contre les forces de l’ordre qui comptent déjà de nombreuses victimes dans leurs rangs (voir ici).

L’opposition, qui n’a pas la majorité au parlement, ne peut en effet compter que sur la « pression » de la rue, autrement dit la violence, pour faire plier le gouvernement et tenter remettre sur les rails l’accord avec l’UE, d’autant plus que les ukrainiens dans leur majorité ne soutiennent pas les pro-européens, comme le montre un récent sondage (voir ici).

Cette stratégie de la tension semble être jusqu’ici payante puisque Viktor Ianoukovitch s’est entretenu une nouvelle fois avec les chefs de file des opposants et a demandé que le Parlement se réunisse en urgence pour discuter de la démission du gouvernement réclamée par l’opposition, et tenter de mettre un terme à la crise politique… sans succès toutefois, l’opposition exigeant purement et simplement la démission du Président, pourtant légitimement élu. Après cet échec de l’ultimatum fixé au Président (voir ici), les violences on repris de plus belle : nouvelles barricades, Ministère de l’Agriculture pris d’assaut par les manifestants en armes … (voir ici).

Ce 19 février, les forces de sécurité ukrainiennes ont repris une partie de la place de l’Indépendance à Kiev après une nuit d’affrontements avec les manifestants antigouvernementaux (voir ici). 

Les États-Unis et l’Union Européenne, qui appuient les revendications de l’opposition, continuent de maintenir la pression et envisagent des sanctions contre Kiev en réponse à la répression des manifestations. Le ministre allemand des Affaires étrangères, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, a brandi la menace de représailles contre les dirigeants ukrainiens, pourtant totalement légitimes. Le vice-président Joe Biden, pour sa part, a eu un entretien téléphonique avec le Président ukrainien et l’a averti que si les autorités ne calmaient pas la situation, cela aurait des “conséquences”.

Dans les coulisses

Comme au temps de la Révolution orange, les médias occidentaux présentent unanimement les manifestations anti-russes comme un mouvement spontané regroupant des « combattants de la liberté » épris d’Europe, en butte à un pouvoir autocratique (voir par exemple ici).

L’inénarable Bernard-Henri Lévy, de tous les mauvais coups contre les pouvoirs hostiles à l’atlantisme, n’a évidemment pas fait défection en appelant même l’UE à suspendre sa participation aux jeux de Sotchi (voir ici).

En réalité, il s’agit d’une manipulation bien rodée et qui a déjà fait ses preuves lors de la Révolution orange dont la logistique avait été assurée par les organisations pro-occidentales Pora et Znayuliées au mouvement Otpor. Celui-ci avait déjà joué un rôle actif dans la chute de l’ex-président Slobodan Milosevic en juillet 2000, dans la « Révolution des roses » georgienne de décembre 2002 ainsi que dans les tentatives de putsch contre le président biélorusse en 2001 et 2004.

Toutes ces organisations sont généreusement financées par des officines occidentales : le Konrad Adenauer Institute, proche de la CDU, l’Open Society Institute de Georges Soros, le National Democratic Institute et la Freedom House, proches du gouvernement américain, entre autres.

Les manifestants actuels semblent bénéficier à nouveau des mêmes largesses dans le financement de mouvements dont l’objectif est in fine de déstabiliser des pays souverains afin de les soumettre aux intérêts occidentaux (voir ici).

En réalité, cela fait déjà longtemps que les USA s’intéressent à l’Ukraine (voir ici). La volonté des américains de renverser le gouvernement ukrainien, pourtant totalement légitime, répond à trois objectifs, de nature économique et géostratégique : renforcer l’OTAN par l’intégration d’un nouveau pays (le plus grand d’Europe), affaiblir la Russie en l’isolant diplomatiquement et s’approprier un marché jugé trop protectionniste en créant un « climat d’investissement favorable aux entreprises étrangères» – en clair : en privatisant ce qui ne l’est pas encore et en faisant prévaloir les intérêts des investisseurs étrangers sur ceux de la population nationale. Ils justifient les financements faramineux investis dans l’aide logistique aux groupes anti-russes ainsi que l’effort déployé par les media occidentaux pour tenter de faire passer pour une révolution populaire et pacifique ce qui n’est ni plus ni moins qu’un coup d’État.

Source: Qui est derrière le coup d’État en Ukraine ? | Nicolas Bourgoin
http://bourgoinblog.wordpress.com/2014/02/19/qui-est-derriere-le-coup-detat-en-ukraine/

Le Young Leader Hollande a été formaté pour casser la Nation française et son peuple…

Les médias et leurs « journaleux » « aux ordres » et nourris « à la soupe des subventions publiques et fiscales » n’en ont que peu parlé…

Et pourtant, c’était sans doute l’essentiel de la rencontre récente entre Obama et Hollande, rencontre à l’issue de laquelle le squatteur de l’Elysée a montré ce qu’il était vraiment: le caniche atlantiste des USA mondialistes et leur porte parole européiste, en matière « économique » notamment.

Qu’on en juge…

A l’issue de ces contacts, le locataire temporaire de l’Elysée s’est engagé à accélérer les négociations entre l’Europe de Bruxelles et les USA à propos du « grand marché transatlantique » ou, si vous préférez, du TAFTA ( Transatlantic Free Trad Area)…

Cet accord de partenariat est négocié depuis juillet 2008 entre les USA et l’Europe, prévoyant, notamment, que les législations des Etats se plient aux normes du libre échange sans frein, normes établies par et pour les grandes entreprises européennes et américaines, sous peine de sanctions pour les pays contrevenants au bénéfice des plaignants… ce qui revient, en fait, à demander aux Etats concernés d’abandonner leur souveraineté en matière de lois sur les échanges commerciaux, les normes de consommation, les nécessaires protection de l’environnement et des citoyens, les conditions de vie, de travail, de rémunération des « travailleurs »… Bref, de faire passer des pans entiers de l’autorité de l’Etat sous la coupe de l’ autorité des multinationales apatrides et dominatrices, ouvrant ainsi un espace nouveau à la Mondialisation.

Le lecteur curieux (de cette curiosité indispensable au citoyen pour qu’il puisse avoir accès à l’information et se déterminer en toute liberté de conscience) se reportera aux 3 textes que je propose à sa lecture (1), les limites de cet article ne pouvant les intégrer…

Et, les ayant lus, il verra combien ce projet conduit par l’Union Européenne, poussé par Hollande et sa clique socialo-écolo, mis dans les cartons par le gouvernement précédent, est lourd de menaces pour l’indépendance de notre Nation, la qualité d’existence de notre Peuple, la sauvegarde des travailleurs et des couches moyennes de notre pays, le développement positif de tout ce qui fait notre quotidienneté.

Hollande, l’Europe de Maastricht, d’Amsterdam, de Lisbonne et les USA : le triptyque gagnant de la Mondialisation libérale et libertaire sous la coupe des féodalités financières transnationales portées par Wall Street et La City, intégrant la finance islamique des pays du Golfe et de l’Arabie Saoudite, structurant les grandes entreprises internationales de l’industrie, des moyens de communication de masse, des services (intellectuels, de l’information et autres), de l’agriculture (par le biais des OGM et des semences…)

Et il ne pouvait en être autrement à partir du moment où une majorité d’électeurs de notre pays, la tête dans le sable et la pensée en sommeil, a confié la plus haute fonction à celui qu’aujourd’hui on moque pour son scooter et son casque, mais qui avait été, et depuis longtemps, formaté pour mener la politique qu’il mène…

Car c’est en 1996 qu’il a été choisi par la French American Foundation comme Young Leader à former…

Ici encore, il faut se rapporter à une documentation précise (2) pour comprendre ce qu’est cette « fondation » mise en place par Giscard et le président américain Gérald Ford et soutenue par les grandes entreprises et structures financières françaises et américaines . Il s’agit, pour cette « fondation », de choisir chaque année une promotion d’une trentaine de » responsables prometteurs » dans la politique ( et ailleurs), dont elle pense qu’ils vont jouer un rôle dans leur pays, et de les préparer à faire de l’amitié franco-américaine leur socle de pensée tout en promouvant, en France, la politique de l’oncle Sam… en liaison avec le réseau américain correspondant de la « fondation », réseau où on trouve aussi bien les Clinton que Robert Zoellick, ancien président de la banque mondiale, ou des dirigeants de grands groupes économiques (CIT Group ou Transamerica Corporation, notamment).

Aujourd’hui, ils sont 400 en France à avoir subi ce parcours, et, parmi eux, Hollande, Moscovici, Belkhacem, et Kosciusko-Morizet et Wauquiez, ou encore Anne Lauvergeon et Stéphane Israël (d’Ariane espace)…

Si l’on ajoute à ce pedigree hollandien, le fait que le bonhomme, quand il oublie son scooter et son casque, participe au club très fermé « Le Siècle » (3) avec, comme commensaux, les représentants les plus importants de la haute finance (Edouard de Rothschild, Michel Pébereau, Jean Peyrelevade, Claude Bébéar…), de l’industrie (Dassault, Gallois, Pépy, Schweitzer, Jaffré…), des media (Pujadas, July, Joffrin, Sinclair, Chabot, Colombani…) , on comprend aisément que , quand il fait des choix politiques et économiques, financiers aussi, ce n’est pas en prenant en compte les intérêts de ceux qui font véritablement la France, de ceux qui constituent, de fait, le Peuple, de ceux qui ont des valeurs et des principes liés à ce Peuple et à cette Nation.

C’est donc un homme de réseaux qui a été élu en mai 2012 (4) : pourtant, avec un peu de bon sens, une once de réflexion, un chouïa d’observation et une bonne lecture de « Riposte Laïque », il aurait été facile à chacun de saisir la réalité et d’entendre, derrière les discours électoraux mensongers, manipulateurs, de pure posture, la vérité criante qu’il voulait étouffer.

Le dernier épisode (avant le prochain) de la mauvaiseté de sa politique , le désormais fameux TAFTA, révèle encore une fois qui il est vraiment et ce pour quoi il est là …

On peut aujourd’hui penser que les citoyens de notre pays, las de souffrir du syndrome d’Epiméthée, sauront lever les yeux pour voir « plus loin » et renvoyer à ses réseaux un bonhomme (suivi de sa clique socialo-écolo) qui n’aurait jamais dû en sortir.

Il arrive cinq scrutins électoraux pour cela.

Robert Albarèdes

1 – http://www.bvoltaire.fr/alaindebenoist/gmt-comment-les-usa-vont-continuer-de-depecer-leurope,50630

http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2013/11/WALLACH/49803

http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/europe/article/les-cocus-de-la-democratie-146662

2- http://french-american.org/

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/French-American_Foundation

http://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Les-Young-Leaders-de-la-French-American-Foundation-promotion-2013-19626.html

3- http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Si%C3%A8cle

4 – http://www.atlantico.fr/decryptage/gouvernement-hollande-formation-plus-atlantiste-qu-on-pourrait-croire-benjamin-dormann-366638.html

http://elections.lefigaro.fr/presidentielle-2012/2012/06/22/01039-20120622ARTFIG00604-enquete-sur-les-reseaux-de-francois-hollande.php