Attorney General Eric Holder defends killing of American terror suspects
THE 3 STOOGES
Eric Holder said the US had authority to kill American citizens suspected of plotting terror
US Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday defended the government’s use of lethal force against Americans suspected of being plotting terrorism while abroad.
The speech marked the first time a senior US official has publicly justified in legal terms the drone attacks that are believed to have killed at least three US citizens on foreign soil in recent months, including key al-Qaeda figure Anwar al-Awlaki.
“Given the nature of how terrorists act and where they tend to hide, it may not always be feasible to capture a United States citizen terrorist who presents an imminent threat of violent attack,” Mr Holder said in a speech at a law school in Chicago.
“In that case, our government has the clear authority to defend the United States with lethal force.”
Mr Holder said there were circumstances under which “an operation using lethal force in a foreign country, targeted against a US citizen who is a senior operational leader of al-Qaeda or associated forces, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans, would be lawful.”
Such circumstances included that a thorough review had determined the individual posed “an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States” and that “capture is not feasible.”
Thirdly, the “operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles,” Mr Holder told the audience at the Northwestern University School of Law.
“Some have called such operations ‘assassinations.’ They are not… assassinations are unlawful killings,” Mr Holder said.
“Our legal authority is not limited to the battlefield in Afghanistan… We are at war with a stateless enemy, prone to shifting operations from country to country,” he added.
“Our government has both a responsibility and a right to protect this nation and its people from such threats.”
Civil rights groups have cried foul since the killing of Awlaki in Yemen in September in a US raid.
Some argued it was illegal for the US military to kill an American citizen on the battlefield, following no attempt to indict him.
US intelligence officials believed Awlaki was linked to a US army major charged with shooting dead 13 people in 2009 in Fort Hood, Texas, and to a Nigerian student accused of trying to blow up a US airliner on December 25, 2009.
President Barack Obama said in September that Awlaki’s killing was a “major blow” to Al-Qaeda’s Yemeni branch, and marked “another significant milestone in the broader effort to defeat al-Qaeda and its affiliates.”
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) last month filed a lawsuit seeking the release of documents authorizing targeted drone strikes.
US citizen Samir Khan was killed in the same attack on Awlaki, and the cleric’s US-born teenage son was killed in October in a separate strike in Yemen.
(Source: The Telegraph)