DHS findings: People are insufficiently suspicious of their neighbors! Fear levels too low! Alert!

Privacy SOS

How can you be a better snitch patriot? How can DHS make you feel more comfortable calling, texting, tweeting, facebooking, emailing, or mobile app-ing your concerns about the people around you to the police or the feds? Why don’t you feel comfortable doing this now? Why aren’t you more afraid?

DHS wants to know.

Ok, so those weren’t exactly the questions DHS had a private research firm ask US residents during in person focus group and telephone polling sessions, but they are close. Here’s an actual question:

“What would make the reporting of suspicious activity easier for you and your neighbors?”

Part of the problem, as DHS saw it, was that people weren’t reporting on each other enough. It’s not only a “quality” problem, but a “quantity” problem that needs fixing, it says. So naturally, it did focus groups. And polling. (At cost to taxpayers? I don’t know; couldn’t find out.)

So how’d we do when put to the FEAR TEST, us US residents? Not bad, actually. US persons come away from the focus groups and polling looking like pretty stand up people.

When DHS’ private contractor ICF Macro laid out a bunch of scenarios for people and asked if they would report “suspicious” activity to the police in those situations, forty-three percent of the people who demurred said that they would hesitate out of “concern you may get an innocent person in trouble.” Kudos, USA! That’s some great independent thinking and love of neighbor, not to mention clear evidence that the government’s sustained fear campaigns have not had the intended effect of sufficiently frightening us into submission or fear of one another. There is hope yet!

Though disturbingly, some of the fear-mongering over the past ten years must have rubbed off on young people more effectively than our older compatriots: while 54% of people aged 65+ said they didn’t want to rat on people for fear that they would harm an innocent person, only 41% of 18-34 year olds said the same. Older respondents also reported being more uncomfortable judging people than the younger participants.

But strangely enough, while young people are less afraid of getting innocent people in trouble with the cops, they also don’t trust the cops, fear police, and were the most likely of all the demographics to think that officers wouldn’t take their suspicious activity reports seriously! Kids these days…so confused!

Distaste for the notion of getting innocent people locked up for no reason wasn’t the only reason people said they wouldn’t report “suspicious activities” to police. They also listed “fear of retaliation” and discomfort with “judging others.” One in three respondents said that they wouldn’t report the incident or person because they weren’t sure it was a “worthwhile use of police resources.” More than one in five said that they wouldn’t report because of “fear or mistrust of law enforcement” — but again, that spikes to more than one in three for people aged 18-34.

The better to report you with, my pretty

Besides asking why people wouldn’t report, DHS also tasked its contractor to ask people about the “methods for reporting” they were most likely and comfortable to use. Most people said that if there was some kind of suspicious emergency they’d call 9-1-1. But one in three said that they’d happily submit a suspicious activity report via an anonymous mobile app, like the one the Virginia Fusion Centerreleased to the public earlier this year.

Fancy mobile app or no, DHS found that the biggest problem is that people simply weren’t getting the message about suspicious activity reporting. No one in the enormous government bureaucracy thought it possible that people are simply not comfortable with its Stasi 2.0 methodology, and so emphasis is instead put on further educating the American public. “The importance of educating the public about suspicious activity reporting was emphasized throughout the research,” the report says.

In order to better educate us about why we should be afraid and vigilant and suspicious of everything happening around us at all times, however, DHS needs to “better understand how to most effectively deliver the message to the public.” And so they asked the focus group and telephone poll participants “about their preferred sources of information.”

People said public service announcements on TV and radio were probably the most effective, next to, in descending order of importance: presentations at school, work or community meetings; billboards; posters in mass transit stations; educational pamphlets; ads in local newspapers; an email or text alert; and links of community or local government websites. So look out for DHS propaganda about suspicious activity reporting coming at you via all of those mediums! Lucky us!

Think locally, report suspicious activity locally

Among DHS’ major findings from the research is that police and federal enforcement agencies need to promote “the shared responsibility of suspicious activity reporting [so that] law enforcement can benefit from the extra eyes and ears on the neighborhood, and the public will feel more trusting toward law enforcement and more invested in community safety.” (Hey DHS, just a thought: a better way for you to get people to trust law enforcement would be to stop promoting a law enforcement framework that enables stuff like this, this, this, this,this, this and this.)

DHS then says that local vigilante operations like the “Neighborhood Watch” program or other “volunteer groups” are great assets that can help police follow up on tip status and even fill out paperwork in coordination with officials. (Um, seriously? I guess this report was written before “neighborhood watch” volunteer George Zimmerman killed young Trayvon Martin in Florida last month.)

It isn’t just that we silly civilians don’t fully appreciate our “responsibility” to serve as foot-soldiers for the modern Stasi, no no no. The knowledge gap goes deeper, to DHS’ great dismay. Shockingly, when people surveyed were asked what they thought was suspicious activity they reported such things as people breaking into cars, brandishing guns or other weapons, and other obviously criminal, harmful, scary stuff.

DHS haz a major sad about this: “Only five percent of survey respondents described potential pre-operational terrorist activity. This indicates that members of the public do not typically perceive suspicious activity as it may relate to potential terrorism related operations.” ONLY FIVE PERCENT! ZOMG!

People! You are insufficiently afraid and obsessed with the kind of violence that is so utterly unlikely to ever happen to you that you are more likely to get struck by lightning four times than killed by terrorists! But that’s irrelevant. Be more afraid! For shame!

It’s a major problem, but DHS has a fix: “Communication must encourage the public to expand its idea of suspicious activity to include behaviors that in and of themselves may not be criminal but may be precursors to or indicative of a terrorist act.” Got it? Expand your mind, people. Think big, fearsome thoughts.

Getting people over that “not afraid” hump is not going to be easy, though. And besides, people keep yapping about incriminating innocent people. “Concerns about getting innocent people in trouble…are significant barriers to suspicious activity reporting.” But DHS has a solution to that problem too. After all, who better to assuage our concerns than our own “local leaders”?

“Public messaging about the importance of suspicious activity should come from local leaders,” DHS says. Janet Napolitano hawking the program isn’t cutting it, apparently. Send in the mayor!

Besides overcoming the significant hurdles posed by NOT ENOUGH FEAR and concerns about incriminating innocent people, respondents also mentioned being worried about retaliation. So DHS proposes that local officials produce better ways for people to anonymously snitch, so that they’ll feel more comfortable doing so. No matter that this will also make the likelihood of abusive, intentional false reporting much higher, the report says: “Communities should leverage new technologies to promote anonymous and easily accessible methods of reporting.” Make it easier and anonymous! What could go wrong?

Let’s review. The major problems, as DHS sees it: People aren’t afraid enough, and worry that they will get someone innocent in trouble with police that they don’t trust.

Instead of fixing the underlying problems that lead to this mistrust, though, DHS’ plan is to simply drill down on the fear quotient — what it calls “education.” Sure, that guy might not be doing anything criminal, but why wait? Better to report him than not to, the message seems to be.

In its quest to reeducate US persons about the innumerable, fearsome, diverse threats among us, DHS will have to catch up to the FBI, which has been busyinstilling fear into the minds of shop owners and hotel managers for years now. Watch for the signs, people. You might even be a suspicious character, and you just don’t know it.


Source: Privacy SOS

36 comments on “DHS findings: People are insufficiently suspicious of their neighbors! Fear levels too low! Alert!

  1. Pingback: NewsLinks | Intrepid Report.com

  2. DHS and the Patriot Act are tied for the worst things Bush gave us. (Iraq War–maybe there’s a 3-way tie). I have little hope we will ever get a Patriot in the WH and small government-controlled congress to do away with the federal government agencies, laws and mindset that steal our liberties.

  3. Wow, superb blog format! Howw lengthy have you been blogging for?
    you make blogging glance easy. The ffull look of your site is wonderful, as smartly
    as the content!

  4. I have been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or
    blog posts in this kind of house . Exploring in
    Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Studying this info So i am satisfied to convey that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I found out just what I
    needed. I such a lot certainly will make sure to don?t forget this website and
    give it a look on a constant basis.

  5. Still, it’s a stretch to say, as is commonly
    heard, that the U. Various other sources have
    also stated that users will be able to control the PS4 remotely from smartphones and tablets.
    The 3DS uses what is called autostereoscopy, which is a style of 3D similar to the
    3D you see on printed 3D images.

  6. This is very interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more
    of your magnificent post. Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks!

  7. See here to start posting your ads on The Free Ad Forum now.

    Another advantage of social traffic over paid traffic is the
    influence that you can gain in social media.
    This is word-of-mouth free traffic or viral traffic.

  8. Here we wiol anngry birds epic haack tool look at episodde one which is called Poached Eggs.
    Angry Birds: Spce has been confirmed for the iPhone, featuring simplistic, often quite short,
    riffs. Angry Birds walkthrough makes it possible for players to
    beat every game level with the greatest number of stars.
    If you love project management you will have the feeling that they caan run away or attack the food.
    Peter Vesterbacka, marketing cchief of the Finnish firm’s games.

  9. But, if I have to wait 25 minutes? Every successful switch costs a
    move annd the game is candy crush saga hack going backk onto eBay.
    The report goes on to note that folur other games are among those with the” most Liked” on Facebook right

  10. Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s challenging to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appearance.
    I must say that you’ve done a fantastic job with this. Additionally, the blog loads super fast for me on Chrome.
    Outstanding Blog!

  11. Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am
    a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; we have created some
    nice procedures and we are looking to exchange methods with others, be
    sure to shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  12. Et il est idéal pour continuer à se détendre après comment perdre du
    poids une séance de sauna portable permet de perdre du poids est quelque
    chosse de nouveau. La protéine est essentielle pour maintenir
    votre métabolisme se déplaçant et protéine possède également d’autres avantages pour la perfte de poids
    dee la planète qui va stimuler votre métabolisme.

  13. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but
    your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back down
    the road. Cheers

    • Good day, at the bottom right, you can enter your e-mail and join the others 2789 followers, you will then get new posts delivered to your Mailbox. you can also follow us on Twitter @Counterpsyops

  14. It has seen that most of the people fail to identify whether the diamond is actual or
    replica, hence the certification is fairly important.
    We simply love HardX. Common people need some role models in their life
    to imitate. Hard X now, This will lead to greater confidence
    when stepping out on the beach where, in general,
    people will only be checking you out from a distance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s