The fact that Malaysia Airlines flight 370 was taken over remote-controlled by rogue U.S.-government / U.S. military elements continues to be dismissed by a growing number of people and media outlets – because a person would actually have to be on board to hijack any plane – even though that technology is proven to have been developed and therefore exists.
MARCH 17, 2014
Field McConnell’s (Abel Danger) Interview About Boeing’s Uninterruptible Autopilot System
It was announced in 2007 that by 2009 all commercial jets from Boeing would have this UAS installed, that’s already 5 years ago.
Again, that AWACS, even a remote-controlled version (AEW UAV), is perfectly capable of assisting in the remote-controlled takeover of any commercial jet by jamming radars and satellites is not a wild guess, its one of its standard applications. This is already known for many years, even by folks not affiliated with the military. It’s even been published numerous times in specialized publications. Even if you never read any of those you can still find this information in mainstream outlets online. The information is so common that it was already published for the public in at least 1986.
Herebelow is the chronology of the announcement of the BUAP: Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot, which allows remote controlled take over of any commercial airplane equipped with this system. Boeing already confirmed in 2007 that all its jets were to be fitted with this system. Note that Airbus has a similar equipment on all its jets.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2001
“Bush Announces New Airline Security Measures:
…The president said new security measures would also dramatically increase the number of plainclothes federal marshals on airplanes, give $500 million to developing enhanced cockpit security and enable air traffic controllers to take over a distressed aircraft and land it by remote control.” – PBS
Airborne Early Warning Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
“Several strengths and weakness exist for the AEW UAV concept. The first strength involves cost. UAVs with only the “gather data” and “transmit data” elements (see Figure 2) would be relatively more inexpensive than the AWACS system—even though many would be needed since each would be relatively smaller/lighter and would probably lack the power needed to extend radar range as far as the traditional platform. Second, either Sub-concept 1 or 2 could 27 provide extended coverage by extending the AEW platforms’ orbit areas across the FEBA without placing an extremely expensive platform with a large crew in jeopardy. Third, with Sub-concept 2 (the hive principle), the sensor element of the high value asset becomes dispersed, which makes knocking out the “data gathering” function harder to achieve. On the other hand, there are weaknesses. The more capabilities added to the AEW UAV, the larger and more costly the platform becomes (Examples of additional capabilities are: ESM, remotely-controlled maintenance/optimization of mission systems, remote piloting capability, and extended range/endurance/altitude).” – AU/ACSC
DECEMBER 4, 2006
“Boeing Wins Patent on Uninterruptible Autopilot System
Boeing is, of course, not the first autopilot technology in existence, but this one has been designed with counterterrorism first and foremost in mind. Not only is it ‘uninterruptible’ — so that even a tortured pilot cannot turn it off — but it can be activated remotely via radio or satellite by government agencies.” – HSNW
AUGUST 1, 2000
“Saab reveals UAV concepts for internet-based warfare
SAAB Technologies has unveiled concepts for medium-altitude strike reconnaissance and high-altitude airborne early warning (AEW) unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) as part of a proposed low-cost approach to an internet-based command and control network being developed for the Swedish defence forces
…All three UAV types would draw heavily on technology developed for Gripen. Command and control would be via an in-theatre battlefield network based on broadband communications using wireless Internet protocol (IP).
…Airborne trials, with wireless IP nodes fitted to Swedish Air Force Gripen aircraft as well as maritime and land-based platforms are to commence in 2005. The programme is intended to culminate in the fielding of operational systems in the 2010-2020 timeframe.” – Flight Global
It is safe to assume that the above Swedish technology is also used by the U.S. military. The following U.S. government document at least indicates that there’s an active collaboration between the the two countries when it concerns military research and development information:
“… Recognizing that the Exchange of Notes constituting the General Security of Military Information Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Government of the United States of America. which entered into force December 23, 1981, applies to this Agreement; Recognizing the successful collaboration under the Agreement between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden Concerning Exchange of Research and Development Information (Short Title: Sweden-U.S.Master Information Exchange Agreement), which entered into force June 13, 1997, and the Information Exchange Annex D-05-SW-0002 Concerning Information Assurance, which entered into force December 7, 2005.” – US Department of Defense
Source: PUBLIC INTELLIGENCE