Letter from David Ben-Gurion to his son Amos, written 5 October 1937

Obtained from the Ben-Gurion Archives in Hebrew, and translated into English by the Institute of Palestine Studies, Beirut

5 October 1937
Dear Amos,

I was not angry at you, but I was very sorry indeed that there was no reply from
you. I cannot accept the excuse that you have no time. I know you have a lot of
work at school, in the field, and at home, and I am happy that you are so
preoccupied with your studies. But it is always possible to find free time if
necessary, not only on Sabbath days but even during weekdays. Your excuse that I
keep moving from one country to another is not convincing. You can write to me
in London. Here they [the Jewish Agency office] always know where I am, and
they are efficient in forwarding my mail. As to the question of my membership in
the executive committee [of the Jewish Agency], I shall explain to you in person if
I meet you in Tel Aviv upon my return. Here what I want to talk about is the
conflict you are experiencing between your reason and your emotions with regard
to the question of the state. Political matters should not be a question of emotions.
The only thing that should be taken into account is what we want and what is best
for us, what will lead to the objective, and which are the policies that will make us
succeed and which will make us fail.

It seems to me that I, too, have “emotions” [quotation marks in original. Hebrew:
regesh]. Without these emotions I would not have been able to endure decades of
our hard work. It definitely does not hurt my feelings [regesh] that a state is
established, even if it is small.

Of course the partition of the country gives me no pleasure. But the country that
they [the Royal (Peel) Commission] are partitioning is not in our actual possession;
it is in the possession of the Arabs and the English. What is in our actual
possession is a small portion, less than what they [the Peel Commission] are
proposing for a Jewish state. If I were an Arab I would have been very indignant.
But in this proposed partition we will get more than what we already have, though
of course much less than we merit and desire. The question is: would we obtain
more without partition? If things were to remain as they are [emphasis in original],
would this satisfy our feelings? What we really want is not that the land remain
whole and unified. What we want is that the whole and unified land be Jewish
[emphasis original]. A unified Eretz Israeli would be no source of satisfaction for
me– if it were Arab.

From our standpoint, the status quo is deadly poison. We want to change the status
quo [emphasis original]. But how can this change come about? How can this land
become ours? The decisive question is: Does the establishment of a Jewish state
[in only part of Palestine] advance or retard the conversion of this country into a
Jewish country?
My assumption (which is why I am a fervent proponent of a state, even though it is
now linked to partition) is that a Jewish state on only part of the land is not the end
but the beginning.

When we acquire one thousand or 10,000 dunams, we feel elated. It does not hurt
our feelings that by this acquisition we are not in possession of the whole land.
This is because this increase in possession is of consequence not only in itself, but
because through it we increase our strength, and every increase in strength helps in
the possession of the land as a whole. The establishment of a state, even if only on
a portion of the land, is the maximal reinforcement of our strength at the present
time and a powerful boost to our historical endeavors to liberate the entire country.
We shall admit into the state all the Jews we can. We firmly believe that we can
admit more than two million Jews. We shall build a multi-faceted Jewish
economy– agricultural, industrial, and maritime. We shall organize an advanced
defense force—a superior army which I have no doubt will be one of the best
armies in the world. At that point I am confident that we would not fail in settling
in the remaining parts of the country, through agreement and understanding with
our Arab neighbors, or through some other means.

We must always keep in mind the fundamental truths that make our settlement of
this land imperative and possible. They are two or three: it is not the British Mandate nor the Balfour Declaration. These are consequences, not causes. They

are the products of coincidence: contingent, ephemeral, and they will come to an
end. They were not inevitable. They could not have occurred but for the World
War, or rather, they would not have occurred if the war had not ended the way it

But on the other hand there are fundamental [emphasis original] historical truths,
unalterable as long as Zionism is not fully realized. These are:

1) The pressure of the Exile, which continues to push the Jews with propulsive
force towards the country
2) Palestine is grossly under populated. It contains vast colonization potential
which the Arabs neither need nor are qualified (because of their lack of
need) to exploit. There is no Arab immigration problem. There is no Arab
exile. Arabs are not persecuted. They have a homeland, and it is vast.
3) The innovative talents of the Jews (a consequence of point 1 above), their
ability to make the desert bloom, to create industry, to build an economy, to
develop culture, to conquer the sea and space with the help of science and
pioneering endeavor.

These three fundamental truths will be reinforced by the existence of a Jewish state
in a part of the country, just as Zionism will be reinforced by every conquest, large
or small, every school, every factory, every Jewish ship, etc.

Our ability to penetrate the country will increase if we have a state. Our strength
vis-à-vis the Arabs will likewise increase. The possibilities for construction and
multiplication will speedily expand. The greater the Jewish strength in the
country, the more the Arabs will realize that it is neither beneficial nor possible for
them to withstand us. On the contrary, it will be possible for the Arabs to benefit
enormously from the Jews, not only materially but politically as well.
I do not dream of war nor do I like it. But I still believe, more than I did before the
emergence of the possibility of a Jewish state, that once we are numerous and
powerful in the country the Arabs will realize that it is better for them to become
our allies.

They will derive benefits from our assistance if they, of their own free will, give us
the opportunity to settle in all parts of the country. The Arabs have many countries
that are under-populated, underdeveloped, and vulnerable, incapable with their
own strength to stand up to their external enemies. Without France, Syria could not
last for one day against an onslaught from Turkey. The same applies to Iraq and to
the new [Palestinian] state [under the Peel plan]. All of these stand in need of the
protection of France or Britain. This need for protection means subjugation and
dependence on the other. But the Jews could be equal allies, real friends, not
occupiers or tyrants over them.

Let us assume that the Negev will not be allotted to the Jewish state. In such event,
the Negev will remain barren because the Arabs have neither the competence nor
the need to develop it or make it prosper. They already have an abundance of
deserts but not of manpower, financial resources, or creative initiative. It is very
probable that they will agree that we undertake the development of the Negev and
make it prosper in return for our financial, military, organizational, and scientific
assistance. It is also possible that they will not agree. People don’t always behave
according to logic, common sense, or their own practical advantage. Just as you
yourself are sometimes split conflicted between your mind and your emotions, it is
possible that the Arabs will follow the dictates of sterile nationalist emotions and
tell us: “We want neither your honey nor your sting. We’d rather that the Negev
remain barren than that Jews should inhabit it.” If this occurs, we will have to talk
to them in a different language—and we will have a different language—but such a
language will not be ours without a state. This is so because we can no longer
tolerate that vast territories capable of absorbing tens of thousands of Jews should
remain vacant, and that Jews cannot return to their homeland because the Arabs
prefer that the place [the Negev] remains neither ours nor theirs. We must expel
Arabs and take their place. Up to now, all our aspirations have been based on an
assumption – one that has been vindicated throughout our activities in the country
– that there is enough room in the land for the Arabs and ourselves. But if we are
compelled to use force – not in order to dispossess the Arabs of the Negev or
Transjordan, but in order to guarantee our right to settle there – our force will
enable us to do so.

Clearly in such event we will have to deal not only with the Arabs living in Eretz
Israel, since it is very probable that Arabs from the neighboring countries will 5
come to their aid. But our power will be greater, not only because we will be better
organized and equipped, but also because behind us stands a force still greater in
quantity and quality. This is the reservoir of the millions in the Diaspora. Our
entire younger generation of Poland, Romania, America, and other countries will
rush to our aid at the outbreak of such a conflict. I pray to God that this does not
happen at all. Nevertheless the Jewish state will not rely only on the Jews living in
it, but on the Jewish people living in every corner of the world: the many millions
who are eager and obliged [emphasis original] to settle in Palestine. There are not
millions of Arabs who are compelled or willing to settle in Palestine. Of course it
is likely that Arab adventurers and gangs will come from Syria or Iraq or other
Arab countries, but these can be no match for the tens and hundreds of thousands
of young Jews to whom Eretz Israel is not merely an emotional issue, but one that
is in equal measure both personal and national.

For this reason I attach enormous importance to the conquest of the sea and the
construction of a Jewish harbor and a Jewish fleet. The sea is the bridge between
the Jews of this country and the Jewish Diaspora – the millions of Jews in different
parts of the world. We must create the conditions that will enable us in times of
necessity to bring into the country in our own ships manned by our own seamen,
tens of thousands of young men. Meanwhile we must prepare these young men
while they are still in the Diaspora for whatever task awaits them here.

I am confident that the establishment of a Jewish state, even if it is only in a part of
the country, will enable us to carry out this task. Once a state is established, we
shall have control over the Eretz Israeli sea. Our activities in the sea will then
include astonishing achievements.

Because of all the above, I feel no conflict between my mind and emotions. Both
declare to me: A Jewish state must be established immediately, even if it is only in
part of the country. The rest will follow in the course of time. A Jewish state will

My warm greetings [Hebrew: Shalom Rav].

When do you return to Kadoorie [agricultural school]? Write to me. Show this
letter to your mother and sisters.


Your father

Report: US & Arab States Set To Impose No Fly Zone Over Syria

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wedneday, November 23, 2011

Reports out of Kuwait suggest that Arab states are set to impose a no fly zone over Syria with US logistical support, advancing the prospect of a military assault to topple Syrian President Bashar al-Assad under a “humanitarian” pretext.

“Senior European sources said that Arab jet fighters, and possibly Turkish warplanes, backed by American logistic support will implement a no fly zone in Syria’s skies, after the Arab League will issue a decision, under its Charter, calling for the protection of Syrian civilians,” reports Albawaba, citing Kuwait’s al Rai daily.

YNet news, the website for Israel’s most widely read newspaper, also carried the report.

As part of a plan to cripple the country’s military forces within 24 hours, the “movement of Syrian military vehicles, including tanks, personnel carriers and artillery,” would all be banned under the terms of the no fly zone.

Syrian opposition forces have repeatedly called for a no fly zone to be enforced over the country, but last month NATO all but ruled out the prospect. Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry has also called on the Obama administration to impose a no fly zone without waiting for a green light from the United Nations.

“If indeed Europe and the Western world is dead set upon an aerial campaign above Syria, then all eyes turn to the East, and specifically Russia and China, which have made it very clear they will not tolerate any intervention. And naturally the biggest unknown of all is Iran, which has said than any invasion of Syria will be dealt with swiftly and severely,” reports Zero Hedge.

Hostilities have accelerated in recent days, with Russian warships entering Syrian territorial waters on Friday in an aggressive maneuver designed to discourage any NATO-led attack.

Without Russia’s help, Syria would be largely defenseless against a NATO attack. “I don’t see any purely military problems. Syria has no defence against Western systems … [But] it would be more risky than Libya. It would be a heavy military operation,” former French air force chief Jean Rannou commented.

While NATO powers have accused the Syrian regime of carrying out atrocities against its citizens, others have framed the bloodshed in the context of a civil war. As we saw with Libya, rebel fighters who were commandeering fighter jets and firing rocket-propelled grenades were still being described as “protesters” by the establishment media days before the no fly zone was imposed and the bombing campaign began.

As we saw prior to the attack on Libya, which was also framed as a “humanitarian intervention,” NATO powers are keen to demonize Assad’s government by characterizing attacks by his forces as atrocities while largely ignoring similar attacks by opposition forces, such as a raid on a Syrian air force intelligence complex earlier this month that killed or wounded 20 security police.

Source: Prison Planet