Obama is Shamelessly in Bed with Al-Qaeda

New evidence, published over the past 24 hours by the McClatchy News Service and Britain’s Daily Telegraph, once again confirms that President Obama is shamelessly in bed with al-Qaeda terrorists in the drive to overthrow the Assad government in Syria. Just yesterday, speaking at National Defense University, President Obama reiterated his demand for regime change and issued a lying claim that Syria is considering launching chemical weapons attacks against neighbor Turkey.

Obama is not only repeating the Bush-Cheney era “weapons of mass destruction” lies to justify regime change and war crimes. He is not even making a pretense of going to the United Nations Security Council or the U.S. Congress before taking military action. Yesterday, he also confirmed that the United States would be willing to send Patriot III missile batteries to southern Turkey as part of the direct planned NATO intervention.

As Lyndon LaRouche has warned repeatedly, such actions against Syria are really directed against Russia and China, and can lead to thermonuclear world war and extinction.

Continue reading

Obama’s memo on “insider threats”

20121130-090240.jpg

Directs agency and department heads to establish a program to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security

By Doug Hagmann, Canada Free Press

On the day before Thanksgiving, Barack Hussein Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum, or an unofficial directive to the heads of departments and agencies under the executive branch. This Presidential Memorandum, the text of which is only 183 words, directs agency and department heads to establish a program “to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security.”

Much like all of Obama’s other directives, Executive Orders and findings, there is a disturbing level of ambiguity contained within this memorandum. One could correctly state that the obvious intent of this directive is to stop government employees from leaking classified information that would endanger the safety and security of our nation. While true, there appears to be a deliberate lack of specificity concerning the exact elements that constitute such an “insider threat.”

There is, however, a more important aspect to this memorandum that will be undoubtedly missed by many who report on it. It is reflected by a word that appears toward the end of the directive and should be considered the “key” to understanding the intent and action of Barack Hussein Obama. The word is “centrally,” and when it is considered in the context of Obama’s agenda we’ve seen being implemented over the last four years, it is chilling.

Continue reading

Exposé on the OBAMA/BUFFET CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

20121127-195257.jpg
Forbidden History

In 2008, Nebraska based investor Warren Buffett endorses Barack Obama. This gives Obama much needed protective political cover. People reason that if the “capitalist” Buffett supports Obama, then he can’t be that bad.

In 2009, Warren Buffett’s investment company, Berkshire Hathaway, purchases the Burlington-Northern railroad outright, to the tune of 34 Billion!

Obama loves to cite “The Buffett Rule” (tax hike on rich investors) to add credibility to his own class warfare rhetoric. Obama even goes so far as to borrow Buffett’s secretary as a prop during a State of the Union speech.

In order to transport its oil down to Texas refineries, the Trans-Canada oil company proposes the construction of “the Keystone Pipeline” pipeline. It is estimated that this project will create 20,000 jobs.

Bold Nebraska, an environmentalist group, begins agitating against the pipeline deal. Bold Nebraska’s founding donor (string puller) is Richard Hollanda Berkshire Hathaway business associate and friend of 40 years to Warren Buffet!

Inexplicably, Obama kills the pipeline. The oil will have to be transported on Buffett’s railroad! Compared to pipelines, railway transportation is costlier and wastes energy!

The monopolistic capitalist and the Marxist demagogue actually have much in common. Both are CONTROL FREAKS! One hand washes the other!

Demise of Bin Laden: a delusional tale

“We, uh, threw him in the ocean when nobody was looking…because….because….well, it’s an Islamic custom!”

20121126-183527.jpg

By Kevin Barrett, Truthjihad for Press TV

20121126-184518.jpg
This fake “dead Bin Laden” image was spammed all over the world by the psy-oppers who orchestrated the “death of Bin Laden” hoax.

The “we killed Osama bin Laden, really we did” story is getting more and more bizarre.

On May 2nd, 2011, just hours after the news of the alleged Bin Laden killing was reported, I published a piece that has since gone viral and become something of an underground classic:

“Death of Bin Laden”: A Spectral Human Sacrifice

In that article, I predicted:
“Whatever evidence they produce identifying the ghost or double as ‘Bin Laden’ will probably have the same chain of custody as the Fatty Bin Laden ‘confession video’ of December 2001 – that is, no chain of custody whatsoever.”

Some of my friends thought I was going out on a limb. Surely, they insisted, the US military hoaxers would take the trouble to manufacture some plausible-looking “evidence” that they had actually killed the world’s biggest bogeyman. After all, billions of people worldwide believed the news reports, published in Pakistan, Egypt, and elsewhere, that Bid Laden died of kidney failure in December, 2001.

I disagreed with my friends. The terror-hoaxers have shown us that they are incapable of manufacturing plausible-looking evidence. Instead, they offer absurd, blatantly-fabricated pseudo-evidence so ridiculous that one suspects they are laughing at the public for believing it.

Continue reading

BENGHAZI-GATE – RICE: ‘I LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BECAUSE OF INTEL.’ (REALLY?)

[Editor’s Note: The Narrative about Benghazi were Edited to remove the fact mentioning a planned Terrorist attack in order to follow the White House and Secretary of State version : The ‘story about the spontaneous riots’ due to the youtube anti-muslim film. This False version, this LIE was sustained by the Secretary of State, the Defense Secretary and the President until after the U.S. elections. CIA Director David Petraeus confirmed during House Hearings that it was not the CIA who edited The Narrative. It could only have been done by DHS NAPOLITANO under order of OBAMA.]

Susan Rice Lays All Blame on Intel Community for Her Misleading the American People

20121123-074520.jpg

BY DANIEL HALPER, The Weekly Standard

Ambassador Susan Rice has finally explained, in her opinion, why she misled the country about what happened during the September 11 terror attack against Americans in Benghazi, Libya. According to Rice, all the blame should be given to the intelligence community for her misleading comments made five days after the attack, since she was just repeating what they had told her.

A reporter asked, the American ambassador to the United Nations, “Ambassador Rice, would you explain your view of the controversy concerning your comments about Benghazi? And have—is Senator McCain fair in what he has said?”

“As a senior US diplomat, I agreed to a White House request to appear on the Sunday shows to talk about the full range of national security issues of the day, which at that time were primarily and particularly the protests that were enveloping and threatening many diplomatic facilities—American diplomatic facilities—around the world and Iran’s nuclear program. The attack on Benghazi—on our facilities in Benghazi—was obviously a significant piece of this,” Rice explains.

Continue reading

ANALGATE: The Tit Clouded Cover Up

20121121-224649.jpg

By Lame Cherry

Now that ANALGATE has moved to BUTTRAEUS GATE and on to ABSCAM, this blog has a few more Lame Cherry matter anti matter exclusives.

First, this blog is thankful for Janet Naps Napolitano in finally, since this has moved from the fag file of Obamaland, we are finally getting a criminal scandal due to lesbian Napolitano’s great choice in undercover operatives.
That Lebanese hussy, Jill Kelley is a prime example of how big tits produce a shadow cloud that blinds all lookers on to the Obama operative details.

Look at Paula Broadwell, a graduate of Maddy Albright’s communist school in Denver. One can see now that sweaters can not hide such massive amounts of breasts. Her nipples even are trying to explode thorugh the bra and the sweater. One can see her poised like that for Director Patraeus, and he just doing a “cum for ya” moment that ran into his socks. This North Dakota Germanatrix is what every naughty little soldier wants to dive into that fox hole.

So we know Janet Napolitano employes big breasted women to entice men with lots of brass. That my children is a forensic profile of the people dispatching and involved….they like bitchy MILF’s to get the wood on…..who have dark hair and big tits.

That is important as now the person behind this in Naps will have jokes made at her expense as she moves up to control of all covert black operations at the Department of Agriculture in the next 4 years……yes one moves up from Homeland to Ag, because USDA is where all the real dangerous projects are funded through.

Where was I in this matter anti matter exclusive?

Oh yes this New York Post quote was fascinating about the CIA edits which Director General Patraeus testified to:

The edits would have been made after the statements had left the CIA for review by the Defense and State departments, ultimately landing at the White House.

That is most interesting in the chain of command, as CIA is under the direction of Naps Napolitano, the employer of large chested women for minding large brassed males.
Follow this now in Leon Panetta and Hillary Clinton are being drawn into this. Panetta who was Monday Morning Arm complaining and Clinton who was taking all the blame…….

Continue reading

THE FAG’ ZIONIST DICK SUCKER IN THE WHITE HOUSE COULDN’T CARE LESS ABOUT PALESTINIANS

Barack Obama: Dying to Give a Damn

By Richard Silverstein

Day 6: 95 Palestinians killed, 720 wounded.

The title of this post is harsh. But the one I first considered was even more so: “Barack Obama, go to Hell.” I am so glad I didn’t vote for this man for president. At the time I cast my vote I did it thinking I was doing the right thing. But in my heart regretting it. If I had voted for him, now I my heart would be turning bitter as gall.

Here is what this sorry excuse for a leader had to say today in Thailand:

“[T]here is no country on earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its borders. So we are fully supportive of Israel’s right to defend itself from missiles landing on people’s homes…

Let’s understand what the precipitating event here was that’s causing the current crisis, and that was an ever-escalating number of missiles that were landing not just in Israeli territory but in areas that are populated.”

I also discovered this statement which appears to have been made separately and covers related, but different ground:

“Israel has every right to expect that it does not have missiles fired into its territory,” President Barack Obama said at a news conference in Bangkok at the start of a three-nation visit to Asia.

“If that can be accomplished without a ramping up of military activity in Gaza, that’s preferable,” Obama said. “It’s not just preferable for the people of Gaza. It’s also preferable for Israelis, because if Israeli troops are in Gaza, they’re much more at risk of incurring fatalities or being wounded.”

Let’s address this lame excuse for a political argument.

First, it could’ve been (and possibly was) drafted by an Aipac staffer. It’s directly taken from pro-Israel talking points. You’ve heard the same bullshit from Michael Oren a hundred times. What this argument omits is that Israel has Gaza in a stranglehold. It has turned the enclave into a virtual prison having no economy, no exports, no ability to travel in or out. Gaza is occupied in effect by Israel. This occupation is illegal. Any nation has a right to resist such an occupation.

I do not support firing missiles from Gaza into Israel. But I do not support Israel’s occupation of Gaza either. I do not expect Gazans to roll over and play dead for Israel’s benefit or for the benefit of a U.S. president who has his head up his ass.

The real issue isn’t whether Israel has a right to attack Gaza. The issue is how to get at the root causes of this conflict and resolve it. F-16s, drones, targeted assassinations and helicopter gunships only kick the football farther down the road, as Mitt Romney so aptly put it (who’d have ever thought that Obama would actually follow a Mideast policy outlined by Romney).

Obama says he’s opposed to an Israeli invasion not because many Gazans will be killed (he clearly doesn’t care about that) but because Israelis will die. Have you ever heard anything so callous? Yes, I suppose in all the history of this conflict there have been far more callous statements. But by a U.S. president? Not so many.

Barack Obama: go to Hell. You don’t give a damn. You don’t have a moral bone in your body. Give back that Nobel Peace Prize. You don’t deserve it. In fact, you’ve pissed on it and turned it from gold to (cast) lead.

Continue reading

War In Gaza: Why Now?

Washington’s Blog

Election Politics?

It was widely reported that Israel agreed to delay any war against Iran until after U.S. elections.

A little over a week after the election, Israel launched a “targeted assassination” against the leader of Hamas (who Haaretz called Israel’s subcontractor in Gaza). That is what started the current round of fighting.

Rabbi Arthur Waskow agrees that Israel started the fighting.

Professor Michel Chossudovsky notes:

On November 14, Hamas military commander Ahmed Jabari was murdered in a Israeli missile attack. In a bitter irony, barely a few hours before the attack, Hamas received the draft proposal of a permanent truce agreement with Israel.

“Hours before Hamas strongman Ahmed Jabari was assassinated, he received the draft of a permanent truce agreement with Israel, which included mechanisms for maintaining the cease-fire in the case of a flare-up between Israel and the factions in the Gaza Strip.”(Haaretz, November 15, 2012)

The targeted assassination of Ahmed Jabari was followed by an extensive bombing campaign under Operation Pillar of Cloud. The latter consists of a carefully planned military endeavor.

F-16 fighter planes, Apache helicopters and unmanned drones were deployed. Israeli naval forces deployed along the Gaza shoreline were involved in extensive shelling of civilian targets.

Israel’s defense minister Ehud Barack has confirmed a scenario of military escalation, blaming Palestine for having committed acts of aggression: .

“[t]he provocations we have suffered and the firing of rockets to the southern settlements within Israel have forced us to take this action. I want to make clear that Israeli citizens will not suffer such actions. The targets are to hit the rockets and to harm the organization of Hamas.”

The Israeli attacks were followed by the firing of dozens of rockets by Hamas against Israel.

Palestine’s response was known to Israeli war planners. The resulting Israeli civilian casualties are now being used to justify military escalation on humanitarian grounds.

What we are dealing with is a carefully planned operation, a clear act of provocation. The deaths of Israeli civilians (envisaged and foreseen by IDF military planners) are being used to muster the support of the Israeli public.

Meanwhile, the Israeli attack is casually portrayed by the Western media as part of a legitimate counter-terrorism agenda.

Continue reading