FLIGHT #MH17: THREE PLANE GHOSTS

FLIGHT MH370:
TAIL NUMBER 9M-MRO

FLIGHT MH17:
TAIL NUMBER 9M-MRD

ALLEGED PHOTO OF FLIGHT MH17 TAKEN IN AMSTERDAM BY COR PAN IN A SELFIE BEFORE THE FLIGHT:
TAIL NUMBER 9M-MRC
AT THE TIME OF THIS PHOTO 9M-MRC WAS IN KUALA LUMPUR ARRIVED FROM AUCKLAND ON THE 16TH OF JULY AND STAID THERE UNTIL THE 18TH OF JULY.

By ImYourGhost

The Evidence Is Now Even Stronger! We have a 2nd photo that shows that the plane boarded was MRC, Not MRD!
The Flight MRC Should have NEVER Been there to begin with, according to flight logs!
It also exposes the Fact that Reuters had an Agent on the ground snapping the ‘Last Shots’ of MH17!

By DAHBOO77

FLIGHT MH17 – Kiev Flash Mob’s Final False Flag?

image

By Andrew McKillop, 21ST CENTURY WIRE

The downing of Flight MH17 means that Washington’s gang are on the war path again. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John McCain and even Hillary Clinton – are all insisting that the west has to ‘get tougher’ with Russia. Was this the plan all along?

With little or no evidence to back their claims (déjà vu Syria), the usual suspects and their media moguls are pointing the finger at Russia again. With so much going on in the US and to its special friends in other parts of the world, this crisis event could not have come at a better time. Is this the Kiev Flash Mob’s final card from its dealer at Pennsylvania Ave?

Escalating to War

As any keen observer of the event will tell you, nothing about Washington’s version of events adds up.

Reactions were predictable. Financial markets reacted with a predictable knee-jerk massive gold­ and­ oil price spike, to news of the mid-­air destruction by missile or (theoretically­ only) by an on-board bomb explosion, of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 near Donetsk in Ukraine. The recent ­model Boeing 777 is said to have had 298 persons on board, all of whom died. Known data on the flight, until it suddenly went off-­air, is that the flight was progressing normally at the plane’s design cruise speed (about 0.84 Mach or 1000 kilometres/hour), and its normal cruise altitude of 10,000 metres or 33,000 feet.

image

IMAGE: Pristine, identifiable piece of MH17 (Photo: Life News)

Ground­based missiles (SAM) able to completely destroy a plane with a takeoff weight near 250 tons, with more than 100 tons of fuel on board, at 10,000 metres height, flying at 0.84 Mach are unlikely to be in the hands of ‘pro-­Russian’ rebels in eastern Ukraine. So­called MANPADS or shoulder-launched air defence missile systems like the US ‘Stinger’ or French ‘Mistral’ have a maximum altitude around 4,000 metres for destroying or in the case of large airplanes, severely damaging enemy aircraft.Air-­to-­air missiles (AAM) also able to completely destroy large aircraft at high altitudes need highly sophisticated airplanes, pilots and ground radar support, which are totally outside rebel capacities. The only unknown on the military technology side, therefore, is whether the pro-Russian rebels possess sophisticated SAM air defence missiles, or not.SAM systems have been used in the past by Ukrainian military to destroy civil airliners – by error – and include the advanced BUK air defence system, which has been continually developed firstly by the ex-­USSR, then by Russia since 1979 to counter similar materiel in the NATO countries.Incredibly, Kiev spokespersons immediately claimed that BUK missiles had been used by the rebels to destroy the Malaysian plane, set a false flag, and further “up the ante” in the escalating civil war process. There evidence for this claim is less than impressive – a 5 second YouTube video, seen here.

Proving that Kiev, under the direction of the CIA (the CIA have set-up a station occupying the entire top floor of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense in Kiev) later the same day, Thursday 17 July, they claimed that Russia had used its aviation and AAM weapons to destroy the jetliner. Normally, this would hurt the credibility of Kiev’s finger-pointing, but this was completely black-out of US media and State Department reports, or ‘memory holed’ for expediency of the prevailing narrative being managed by Washington DC.

image

‘An Airborne Lusitania’

The motive for this cynical and criminal act – destroying a civil jetliner – underscores the role of “false flags” to rouse and manipulate public opinion in the supposedly “neutral” US and the EU28 countries. Drawing their political leaderships into the next – international – phase of the Ukrainian civil war is “logical” for the Kiev flash mob government given its lack of success, either military or political, in obtaining full control of separatist regions in eastern Ukraine. Cynically destroying a large civil airliner and killing nearly 300 people is, to be sure, “war logic” but as the 1915 Lusitania incident showed, these incidents can spark a one­-way process to all­-out international war.Single incidents of deliberate attack on civil transport able to cause or accelerate the declaration of war by previously neutral countries due to the death of their citizens in the attack include the renowned Lusitania maritime incident of May 1915. The British asset Lusitania passenger ship traveling from New York to Liverpool, was sunk off Ireland, allegedly by a German U-­boat with 138 Americans among the 1198 total of persons killed. Following this incident it became politically impossible for US President Woodrow Wilson, who had sought to stay neutral, to avoid declaring war against Germany.As we know today, the US political stance on the Ukrainian civil war is that of outright hostility towards Russia and the ‘pro­-Russian’ rebels seeking some level of either recognition or autonomy from the pro-fascist and NATO-backed regime which came to power by a Flash Mob and paramilitary coup in February.


Continue reading

New Information Provides New Questions About Malaysian Flight MH17: KIEV FIGHTERS JETS INVOLVED

image

By Brandon TURBEVILLE, Activist Post

Only yesterday, I wrote an article entitled “6 Reasons To Question The Official Story Of The Malaysian Flight Over Ukraine” where, as the title suggests, I briefly discussed a number of reasons the story presented by Western media outlets blaming Ukrainian separatists and even the Russian government for shooting down the plane were both contradictory and dubious.

Now, on the day after the crash of the flight, more information has emerged regarding the details surrounding what actually brought the flight down. Yet, as is typical in international incidents, the Western press reports simply add more questions to the pile.
First, it is important to point out the deceptive nature of many of the Western reports so it can be demonstrated that the credibility of all future reports should be viewed as highly questionable.

For instance, in the late hours of the evening, a volley of Reports emerged suggesting that a Ukrainian separatist leader had Tweeted a statement gloating over shooting down the Malaysian flight before subsequently deleting the Tweet. In reality, the Twitter statement suggested that the separatists had downed an AN-26, a much smaller cargo transport plane, not the Malaysian flight. If those controlling the Twitter account had fired upon the plane, it seems unlikely that they would have confused the aircraft since there is such a difference in their size.
It was subsequently revealed that the Twitter account being reported upon was not actually run by the commander but that it was a “fan page.” The latter has been curiously left out of later reports.
Even if the Tweet had been from the separatist leader, however, it would only prove that the separatists had made a tragic mistake. Still, it is important to remember that it would have been an entirely justified mistake since civilian air traffic had been largely halted over the area for at least three months. Any pilot or aviation authority flying over this area of Ukraine would indeed have to be acting in a provocative manner, terribly lost, or clinically insane.

It is also important to point out that the entire discussion surrounding the type of missile that brought the plane down has been entirely controlled from the beginning. Initially, suggestions were that the plane was brought down by separatists using shoulder-fired missiles. However, it was soon revealed that shoulder-fired missiles could not have reached a plane flying at those altitudes.

Next, the idea came that the separatists or the Russians used BUK medium-range missiles to bring down the plane. Of course, the Russians do possess BUK missiles. Western media then seized upon a single report in the Russian press, an institution that is repeatedly denigrated when it contradicts the NATO party line but cited as fact when it corroborates it, which suggests that the rebels had seized a base in late June and now had BUK missiles in their possession.

Conveniently, there is no mention of the ITAR-TASS report that the Ukrainian military had moved its BUK missile system into Donetsk the day before the plane was brought down.

Very few mainstream outlets, however, are even considering the possibility that it was the Ukrainian military that shot down the Malaysian plane. This is simply because the goal of this whole ordeal, in addition to overshadowing the genocide taking place in Gaza, is to drum up international hostility toward Russia and the separatists that it supports.

It is also important to point out that nowhere in the mainstream press are there any suggestions of the possibility that it was not a missile that brought down the plane. That is, there is no suggestion of this possibility unless it can be blamed on Russia.

What is notable is the fact that there are emerging reports that the Malaysian flight was actually being escorted by Ukrainian military jets only 3 minutes before it crashed.

This report, released by E Turbo News, a global travel news agency, suggested that, not only was the plane being escorted by Ukrainian military jets but that air traffic records were immediately confiscated after the plane went down. The report suggests that internal communication acknowledged that the Ukrainian military was involved but shed no light on where the shootdown orders came from. Speculation ranging from a simple and tragic accident to an attempted coup by Timoshenko forces against the Presidency of Poroshenko have since arisen.

As E Turbo News reports,

This Kiev air traffic controller is a citizen of Spain and was working in the Ukraine. He was taken off duty as a civil air-traffic controller along with other foreigners immediately after a Malaysia Airlines passenger aircraft was shot down over the Eastern Ukraine killing 295 passengers and crew on board.
The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation and basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military was behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down.
Military air traffic controllers in internal communication acknowledged the military was involved, and some military chatter said they did not know where the order to shoot down the plane originated from.
Obviously it happened after a series of errors, since the very same plane was escorted by two Ukrainian fighter jets until 3 minutes before it disappeared from radar.
Radar screen shots also show an unexplained change of course of the Malaysian Boeing. The change of course took the aircraft directly over the Eastern Ukraine conflict region.
Some tweets received suggest this may have been a secret military uprising against the current Ukrainian president under the direction of formerly-jailed Prime Minister Timoshenko.


Continue reading

Bombshell! Proof That Malaysia Flight MH17 Was Diverted Over Ukraine War Zone!

17 juil. 2014 – http://www.undergroundworldnews.com
This serves as absolute proof that Malaysia Flight MH17 was intentionally flown into Hostile Air Space!
So perhaps before coming to “certain” conclusion about the involvement of this rebel or that, the key questions one should ask before casting blame, is why did the pilot divert from his usual flight plan, why did he fly above restricted airspace, and just what, if any instructions, did Kiev air control give the pilot in the minutes before the tragic explosion?

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/MAS17/history/20140717/1000Z/EHAM/WMKK

VIDEO BY DAHBOO77

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-17/was-flight-mh-17-diverted-over-restricted-airspace

Matthias Chang speaks about MH 370 flight

16 avr. 2014Matthias Chang Wen Chieh (60) is a former political secretary to former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad .

He has been active in anti-war movement – Premier Foundation. In 2009, Mathias Chang participated in the convoy Viva Palestina . Of religion Roman Catholic and lives in Kuala Lumpur .
On March 25, 2010, Judge Noor Azian Shaari at the Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled Mathias Chang guilty of contempt of court. He was fined RM20, 000 or a month in prison. Cahang be the first witness in a defamation suit against American Express in 2002.

Fault is that he failed to apologize to the court after going quarrels between him, a judge and a lawyer in cross-examination by counsel in the proceedings of a defamation suit against American Express (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd on Thursday, March 25, 2010. Subsequently, Chang out of the witness box and to complain to the Chief Justice . arrested him.

Chang is a lawyer Manjit Singh. Zainur Zakaria act for Chang in contempt proceedings. American Express is represented by Prakash Menon.