King: I Have a Dream. Obama: I Have a Drone

By Norman Solomon, GlobalResearch.ca

20130123-192350.jpg

A simple twist of fate has set President Obama’s second Inaugural Address for January 21, the same day as the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday.

Obama made no mention of King during the Inauguration four years ago — but since then, in word and deed, the president has done much to distinguish himself from the man who said “I have a dream.”

After his speech at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom in August 1963, King went on to take great risks as a passionate advocate for peace.

After his Inaugural speech in January 2009, Obama has pursued policies that epitomize King’s grim warning in 1967: “When scientific power outruns moral power, we end up with guided missiles and misguided men.”

But Obama has not ignored King’s anti-war legacy. On the contrary, the president has gone out of his way to distort and belittle it.

20130123-192745.jpg

In his eleventh month as president — while escalating the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan, a process that tripled the American troop levels there — Obama traveled to Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. In his speech, he cast aspersions on the peace advocacy of another Nobel Peace laureate: Martin Luther King Jr.

The president struck a respectful tone as he whetted the rhetorical knife before twisting. “I know there’s nothing weak — nothing passive — nothing naive — in the creed and lives of Gandhi and King,” he said, just before swiftly implying that those two advocates of nonviolent direct action were, in fact, passive and naive. “I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people,” Obama added.

Moments later, he was straining to justify American warfare: past, present, future. “To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism — it is a recognition of history; the imperfections of man and the limits of reason,” Obama said. “I raise this point, I begin with this point because in many countries there is a deep ambivalence about military action today, no matter what the cause. And at times, this is joined by a reflexive suspicion of America, the world’s sole military superpower.”

Then came the jingo pitch: “Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: The United States of America has helped underwrite global security for more than six decades with the blood of our citizens and the strength of our arms.”

Crowing about the moral virtues of making war while accepting a peace prize might seem a bit odd, but Obama’s rhetoric was in sync with a key dictum from Orwell: “Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”

Continue reading

Advertisements

At Least 16 Dead Following Latest US Drone Attack in Pakistan

Second strike in 48 hours; Imran Khan announces plans for anti-drone rally in front of UN headquarters

By Common Dreams

In the second attack in as many days, a suspected US drone has killed up to 16 people and wounded 6 more in northwest Pakistan, according to CNN International.

20121012-093637.jpg
Pakistan’s Imran Khan vows to bring his anti-war message to the UN, where he will hold a rally and present the global body with a million signature petition calling for an end to US drone strikes.

The attack occurred in the Orakzai region near the Afghan border, an area repeatedly targeted by the US military. Though the Obama administration and CIA refuse to verify individual cross-border strikes by the unmanned drones, the ongoing program is well known.

Agence France-Presse, citing local officials, reports that four missiles were fired, and that most of the dead were Afghans.

The attack on Thursday follows a separate strike on Wednesday in North Waziristan which reportedly killed five people.

Both attacks occur in the immediate aftermath of a major anti-drone rally that took place in Waziristan last Sunday. Led by Pakistani cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan, the march led thousands, including a delegation of western and US peace advocates, into the tribal areas to draw international attention to the impact the US drone war is having on the region’s people.

Last month, US researchers from the law schools of Stanford and NYU released a report which concluded the US drone program—defended by many US military officials as a key tool in fighting the so-called “war on terror” in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and elsewhere—is itself “terrorizing” and that the overall impact of the campaign in Pakistan is “counterproductive” when it comes to addressing international law, security, and human rights.

Continue reading