ELECTIONS CAN BE RIGGED: Vote fraud expert Bev Harris exposes electronic voting machines

Black Box Voting, founded in 2003, performs nonpartisan investigative reporting on elections in an attempt to stop vote rigging.

You may be wondering what the term “black box” means. A “black box” system is non-transparent; its functions are hidden from the public. Elections, of course, should not be black box systems.

Author Bev Harris became known for groundbreaking work on electronic voting machines, which can remove transparency of the vote count.

With voting machines, all political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors:

By Black Box Voting.org

A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions. Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses. All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors. It’s a product. It’s scaleable. It learns its environment and can adjust to any political environment, any demographic. It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.

Here is a link to a free copy of the book, Black Box Voting HERE.

Please share




Leaked Emails Show Clinton Campaign Coordinating With Soros Organization


By Peter HASSON at the dailycaller

Leaked emails from Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s personal email account published by WikiLeaks reveal the Clinton campaign’s coordination with George Soros’s Open Society Foundations on the subject of police reform.

Soros, who has given almost $10 million to Clinton super PAC Priorities USA, is a major funder of Black Lives Matter. The Washington Times reported in August that Soros has given at least $33 million to the group through the Open Society Foundations (OSF), which he funds and controls.

Both OSF and Clinton have called to crack down on police officers’ “implicit bias.”

As reported by The Daily Caller last month, internal OSF documents say the mainstreaming of “implicit bias” is meant to serve as a foundation from which to overhaul the nation’s anti-discrimination laws and make it easier to file racial discrimination lawsuits by eliminating the need to prove intent.

A December 2015 email exchange between Podesta and OSF president Chris Stone was included in the batch of Podesta’s emails released by WikiLeaks on Friday.

Continue reading

How To Stage A Fake CIA ‘Uprising’ : a 12 STEPS RECIPY


Master Chefs: Brzezinski – Kissinger – Rockefeller

Hong Kong is the latest example.

Are you having a problem with pesky nations that refuse to comply with the Globalist or Zionist program? Worried about the cost and unintended consequences of another Neo-Con war? Well, before you do anything rash, try overthrowing the target government with a “Soft Power” revolution instead. See recipe below.

200px-The_Grboard.jpgsoft-powart.jpg              oragerev.jpg

                                                                                                                  Billionaire Soft Power specialist George Soros owns Obongo!


  • A ton of American cash from the CIA and/or George Soros
  • Small army of undercover CIA agents
  • Controlled “Human Rights /Pro Democracy” groups
  • Idealistic “Western wannabee” college brats
  • Easily manipulated do-gooder “libtards”
  • Professional signs & banners written in English
  • Bribable / blackmailable journalists
  • Bribable / blackmailable politicians
  • Bribable / blackmailable academics
  • Corrupt Union bosses
  • Violent “Agent Provocateurs”


Dispatch your CIA, MI6, & Mossad agents to the target nation. Use various covers such as “exchange student”, “tourist”, “aid worker”, “businessman”, “journalist”, “diplomat”. Be creative!


Soros and CIA drug money is limitless! Pass it around!

Use the humanitarian guise of “pro democracy” or “human rights” to start up your NGO’s (Non Governmental Organizations) inside of the target nation. Provide cover for yourself by doing actual good works, while building up your NGO with local malcontents, libtards, and gullible idealists.

AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg       941869_300.jpg
“Feed the children!”                                                                       Promote “democracy.”
Recruit your network of domestic traitors. Target intellectuals, academics, politicians, journalists, and, if possible, military men. Use bribery to target those who can be bought. Use blackmail to target those who have some stain in their private life.
AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg               AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg
If bribery doesn’t work……                                                                   …use Blackmail.
If the target nation has large Labor Unions, corrupt labor bosses will be very happy to cooperate with you. Yankee dollars are king!

 (Now you are ready to get cooking!)
Pick a catchy theme or color for your “revolution”. Examples include “Prague Spring” (Czechoslovakia, 1968), “Velvet Revolution” (Eastern Europe 1989), Saffron Revolution” (Myanmar), “Cedar Revolution” (Lebanon), “Rose Revolution” (Georgia), “Orange Revolution” (Ukraine), “Green Revolution” (Iran), “Arab Spring” (Egypt, Tunisia, Libya etc) and Hong Kong’s “Umbrella Revolution”. It’s all about marketing, baby!
AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg     AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg     AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg
Green (Iran)                                   Orange (Ukraine)                                                                    Rose (Georgia)
Umbrella Revolution (Hong Kong)
Kick off your “revolution” with a “spontaneous protest”. Use your CIA agents and their controlled NGO idiots to make allegations of “human rights abuses”, or “government corruption” or “election fraud”. It doesn’t matter if the allegations are true or not. Just be passionate!
CIA trained Iranians protest a “stolen” election.
In certain cases, “WikiLeaks” may be able to assist your fake revolution by “leaking” embarrassing secrets about key officials within the target government. When your paid journalists run with the “leaks”, many pissed-off citizens will then join forces with your NGO rent-a-mob.
Julian Assange / CIA (Wikileaks)


Roll out your “spontaneous” banners and protest signs, written in English. You are, after all, trying to manipulate American policy makers and the gullible American public.

AO-Blackmail-Photos.jpg      brazil-protests-june2013.jpg
Iran                                                                               Brazil

Continue reading

La fausse émancipation des Femen


Par Simone Choule via E&R

Perpétuellement considéré dans les médias comme un groupe de femmes « émancipées » et « libérées » et ainsi montré en modèle pour l’opinion, le mouvement « Femen » recouvre pourtant des zones d’ombres quant à ses sponsors, ses financements et sa formation.

Femmes émancipées du Grand Capital ?

Au vu de leurs dernières apparitions sur la scène médiatique (arrivée impromptue au sein de Notre-Dame de Paris, dans le bureau de vote de Berlusconi), les journalistes ont pu constater que les Femen étaient équipées de cartes de presse afin d’infiltrer toutes sortes d’institutions [1]. Cartes de presse de l’Associated Press, agence montée en 1846 par six journaux new-yorkais, et qui a pu renchérir ses affaires en faisant les bons investissements juste au bon moment avant les différents krachs boursiers de l’histoire.

Une agence que l’on découvre financée par les Rockfeller, famille longtemps perçue aux États-Unis comme obsédée par les grands monopoles financiers et à l’origine de nombreuses officines mondialistes (Council on Foreign Relations, Commission Trilatérale, Club Bilderberg…).

Les différentes Femen participant au mouvement se voient recrutées et choisies dans des secteurs où l’argent est roi : de la pornographie [2] aux réseaux de prostitution estudiantine [3], il est difficile de voir en ces victimes du monde libéral les Spartacus du Grand Capital, tant elles ne mordent pas la main qui les nourrit mais en vivent, étant payées jusqu’à 1 000 dollars par mois. Il est évident qu’on les verra moins manifester devant les murs de Wall Street…[3Bis]

Femmes émancipées des hommes ?

Bien que les Femen apparaissent dans les médias comme un mouvement « subversif » et « spontané », se trouvent néanmoins à leur tête des « sextremistes » deux éminences grises discrètes et peu mises en avant dans les mass media : Anna Houtsol et Viktor Sviatski. Si l’une (une petite rousse de 27 ans au visage ferme) a grandi dans les années 90 où l’après-URSS a conduit beaucoup d’hommes au chômage, conduisant les femmes de son village d’origine à prendre les devants pour assurer la survie, l’autre est d’une opacité troublante.

Sviatski connaît parfaitement le fonctionnement des médias. Il est toujours présent au quartier général du mouvement en Ukraine, mais n’apparaît jamais au grand jour. 34 ans, créatif, c’est lui qui amène les idées pour les actions à mener par les « féministes » aux seins nus [4]. La pose au poing levé permet par exemple au spectateur de façonner à peu de frais dans son esprit un réflexe de pensée conditionné indiquant que les Femen sont le synonyme de liberté (poing levé) et de libertaire (seins nus). L’idéologie du Capitalisme de la séduction en somme, comme le confirmerait le philosophe Michel Clouscard.

Ceux qui ont rencontré Viktor Sviatski décrivent quelqu’un doté d’une personnalité dominante, qui n’hésite pas d’exiger à ses activistes de se mettre au régime. Anna Houtsol déclare quant à elle qu’il s’agit juste d’un ami et dédaigne en parler publiquement. Si la présence d’un homme aux côtés des Femen a quelque chose de contradictoire avec leur posture médiatique, le mutisme autour de lui vient renforcer les zones d’ombre qui entourent ce mouvement. Leurs sources de financement restent en effet assez floues. De plus, leurs actions tous azimuts rendent perplexe quant à leur véritable raison d’être (en plus de porter de graves atteintes médiatiques aux intérêts du puissant lobby des soutiens-gorge).

Malgré tout, les Femen s’exportent. Des activistes ukrainiennes forment maintenant des recrues en France, en Allemagne et bientôt au Brésil. Il alors devient évident que les Femen sont émancipées de tout, sauf du mondialisme patriarcal des banques.

Quand les Femen sont soutenues par les médias

[Note de l’Editeur: Afin de ne pas faire plus de publicité à ces Putes ukrainiennes (financées par Soros et l’Oligarchie Mondialiste) qu’elles n’en méritent, nous avons volontairement choisi la photo des Femen détournée par Zeon. Quenellement Vôtre !]

Mercredi 6 mars, Charlie Hebdo sort un numéro spécial Femen qui propose (« en exclusivité en France ») le manifeste Femen, 4 pages rédigées par les Femen (Femen Hebdo), un entretien avec Inna Shevchenko, la fondatrice du groupuscule exilée en France, mais aussi un article de Jean-Yves Camus intitulé : « La France en retard sur la parité par rapport à l’Afrique » et un autre de Zineb, une « sociologue des religions franco-marocaine » dénonçant « l’escroquerie du féminisme islamique ».

Par ojim.fr via E&R

« Un numéro étendard à brandir dans les réunions de familles, au bureau ou dans la rue, habillé ou seins nus, pour comprendre l’esprit Femen et emmerder les machos ! » promet Charlie Hebdo qui ne révèle pas qui finance le mouvement.
Mardi soir à 22h45, France 2 diffuse un documentaire orienté et complaisant («militant ») sur les Femen réalisé par Caroline Fourest et Nadia El Fani, intitulé Nos seins, nos armes. L’organisation catholique traditionnaliste Civitas, qui diffuse sur son blog une photo du PDG de France Télévisions aux côtés d’Inna Shevchenko et de Caroline Fourest, appelle à faire pression sur la chaîne publique pour qu’elle renonce à le diffuser.

Tout ceci pose la question des relations entre les Femen et certains médias. Le 24 février dernier, quand elles ont tenté de sauter sur Silvio Berlusconi, les Femen ont pu approcher il Cavaliere… grâce à des cartes de journaliste Associated Press. L’OJIM a contacté le bureau italien d’AP qui a affirmé que les cartes étaient des fausses. L’AP n’envisagerait aucune action contre le groupe.


unless someone can stop this ruse – george soros controls us completely

“Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
Those who count the votes decide everything.
”Joseph Stalin


Follow the bouncing ball on the criminal corruption ruse of your USA votes.

1.) The Obama Government has outsourced the counting of votes for the 2012 election. But since WHEN does the nation need to outsource a task as uncomplicated and straightforward as vote-counting?

2.) Obama outsorced the counting to a Tampa Florida company, named SOE, that had previously been used to administer the vote counting process for over 500 American jurisdictions.

3.) But recently, SOE software has now been sold to a company named SCYTL, owned by George Soros, headquartered in Spain.

4.) The votes will go to SCYTL, the question becomes as to WHY Must local votes for each precinct will be downloaded to SCYTL’s main server – leaving no TRACEABLE record of how many, and what votes were scored! Which of course means that said votes will be MERGED; and any discrepancies at lower levels will be IMPOSSIBLE to track.

5.) But wait, it gets murkier: SCYTL is shadow owned by Pere Valles, a former CEO of Global Net; who just HAPPENS to have been a maximum level contributor to the Obama Campaign in 2008. Not surprisingly, Valles is also has contacts with Media Matters, a communication consortium owned by: George Soros.

6.) Now the bad news: according to the “Black Box” voting site, this centralizes one “middleman” access point for over 525 voting jurisdictions: (AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. – and growing).

7. If this is allowed to stand, it means that as local election results funnel through SOE’s computers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the main servers for SOE essentially get “first look” at results, AND  the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

8.) This raises an unending amount of troubling questions:

a.) How can a company that is located in Spain owned by George Soros, be responsible for verifying the results of American elections? How can the integrity of the vote be guaranteed, when votes are transmitted in digital form, with NO paperwork backup to check for discrepancies?

b.) It has been questioned since the inception of the voting machine how to preclude tampering with said machines; yet no answers are forthcoming. How easily can the software that controls these devices be programmed to “count” erroneously?

c.) Even worse, with SCYTL in charge, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of resonsibility. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, nor chain of custody, or the count.

Continue reading

Death Squad Coordinator Robert Ford Keynotes Amnesty International Annual Meeting

[EDITOR’S NOTE: Further to yesterday’s episode: an article on Amnesty’s LiveWire blog asking UN Qatar israHell and US to stop arming the opposition, here is an article from March 2012. The following article proves what we were saying yesterday – to those who seemed happy to have Amnesty speaking the truth – that Amnesty is an empire tool and will always act according to empire’s agenda. As we foresaw, Amnesty came up and said it was hacked]

The former US Ambassador to Syria, Robert S. Ford, presented part of the keynote address during the 2012 Amnesty International Annual General Meeting, held in Denver, Colorado between March 30th and April 1st. While AI made sure to keep the appearance of Ford under wraps from the public, it was mentioned by supporting media prior to the event. As well, Ford was listed in the program as a keynote speaker during the second day of the conference. Among others, AI’s annual conference also featured “progressive” radio host Amy Goodman.

Between 2004 and 2006 Ford worked closely under US Ambassador John Negroponte at the US embassy in Baghdad. During his previous tenure as ambassador to Honduras, Negroponte devised and implemented the policy of funding and training death squads to combat leftist insurgencies in the region. In Iraq, Negroponte charged Ford with a similar task: funding and training militias to carry out sectarian violence aimed at a largely Sunni resistance. In late January of 2011, during the same time that the first protests in the country occurred, Ford arrived in Syria to serve as the newly-appointed ambassador. Since, violence has racked the country and Ford has been accused of recruiting and arming foreign fighters from the region to destabilize and possibly overthrow the Syrian government. Continue reading


The BDS ( Boycott, Divest ,Sanction) movement of ‘Omar al Barghouthi’ is an NGO funded by the EU and Soros institutions among others , we have already given a list of the financers of this movement in a previous article and already said that al Barghouthi -who is calling for this boycott at the academic level – is himself enrolled as a student in a post graduate PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM at the Israeli university of Tel Aviv. For all practical reasons this movement seems to defend a good cause , but this is only in appearance because -while dealing with the Zionist state as an Apartheid State ,which is how they describe Israel- the BDS movement is considering it a legitimate state but with racist practices that should be exposed and boycotted and sanctioned the same way they were boycotted and sanctioned previously in South Africa . This is how –the illegitimate state of Israel is being promoted to an Apartheid State which is a status where the existence of Israel is no more questioned or threatened.  A status, according to which, Israel would have to solve few problems of segregation in order to acquire the desired legitimacy and then to enjoy both security and recognition .Regarding this, and if there is any normalization at all between Arabs and Israel, what BDS is doing is pure normalization . All this is financed by the world establishment, inspired by the South African model and carried on by 171 NGOs, all united under the label of BDS. Of course Israel is not about to condescend to any of the BDS demands, nor the BDS will achieve its goal since Israel is NOT South Africa and NOT an Apartheid state. Israel is Israel, and there is nothing like it, not even close to it, unless we want to go 500 years backwards to the times when the white settlers invaded the new continent and started bullying the Natives.

The purpose of all this mobilization and campaigns and huge financing is NOT of course to boycott the Israeli dates that will not need by itself so much effort and exertion . The purpose under this attractive label is to go around the achievements of the Armed Resistance against Israel and its numerous victories over the Israeli state, and to channel the Arab and Palestinian capacities away from the support due to this successful Resistance, towards promoting a mere boycott of exchange of goods and investments in a state threatened- in its own existence- by the victorious Resistance of Hizbullah and Hamas .

There is nothing the world order would not do in order to curb such Resistance, for this reason the Arab Spring was created and the assault on Syria launched ; the first in order to divert the Arab attention from the stunning achievements of the Resistance by involving them in internal differences and conflicts , and the second in order to undermine the great supporter of the Resistance that is Syria . The BDS movement falls within the same range and exploits the great need of Palestinians and Arabs and their friends to support the cause by investing this need in the service of Israel, far from where it should be oriented and directed