Désintox: émission spéciale Charlie Hebdo.

En raison de l’actualité, Jean-Michel Vernochet a modifié le format de sa troisième émission “désintox” pour traiter de l’attentat contre Charlie Hebdo. A savourer sans modération!

Pro-West Snipers Murdered Kiev Demonstrators in False Flag: Canadian Academic Analysis

ap135659596050_2

The murder of 100 pro-West demonstrators in January launched the Revolution. Now many say it was a false flag.

By Ivan Katchanovski (University of Ottawa), for Russian Insider

  • Exhaustive analysis by reputable academic, Canadian Ukraine specialist

  • Challenges narrative of Western media, which alleges the exact opposite

  • Alleges subsequent government cover-up

  • Makes substantial contribution to multiple other media reports alleging the same thesis

This academic paper first appeared on the respected blog, Johnson’s Russia List.

We are publishing it here in full, despite its length, because it is by far the most detailed and thorough investigation of the Kiev Sniper Controversy, drawing on a mass of sources and materials, some of which were previously unpublished.

It is the work of a well-known Canadian political scientist at the University of Ottawa, who is a native of Ukraine. His specialization is Ukrainian politics and history.

The study concludes that, though there is some evidence that some of the protesters killed during the Maidan disturbances may have been accidentally shot by police snipers, the great majority were killed by snipers controlled by the pro-West demonstration leaders in a false flag operation.

The study suggests this was a pre-planned provocation to discredit the then government and that these same leaders both before and especially after they seized power have engaged in a systematic cover up of the facts to conceal their own guilt.

———————-

By Ivan Katchanovski, Ph.D. School of Political Studies & Department of Communication University of Ottawa

Paper presented at the Chair of Ukrainian Studies Seminar at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, October 1, 2014

[With visuals and footnotes here academia.edu/8776021/The_Snipers_Massacre_on_the_Maidan_in_Ukraine]

The massacre of several dozen Maidan protesters on February 20, 2014 was a turning point in Ukrainian politics and a tipping point in the escalating conflict between the West and Russia over Ukraine.
The mass killing of the protesters and the mass shooting of the police that preceded it led to the overthrow of the highly corrupt and pro-Russian, but democratically elected government of Viktor Yanukovych and gave a start to a large-scale violent conflict that continues now in Donbas in Eastern Ukraine.
A conclusion promoted by the post-Yanukovych governments and the media in Ukraine that the massacre was perpetrated by government snipers on a Yanukovych order has been nearly universally accepted by the Western governments and the media, at least publicly, without concluding an investigation and without all evidence considered.For instance, Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko in his speech to the US Congress on September 18, 2014 again claimed that the Yanukovych government overthrow resulted from mass peaceful protests against police violence, in particular, killings of more than 100 protesters by snipers on February 20, 2014.

The question is which side organized the snipers massacre. This paper is the first academic study of this crucial case of the mass killing. Analysis of a large amount of evidence in this study suggests that certain elements of the Maidan opposition, including its extremist far right wing, were involved in this massacre in order to seize power and that the government investigation was falsified for this reason.

Evidence

Evidence used in this study includes publicly available but unreported, suppressed, or misrepresented videos and photos of suspected shooters, live statements by the Maidan announcers, radio intercepts of the Maidan snipers, and snipers and commanders from the special Alfa unit of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), ballistic trajectories, eyewitness reports by both Maidan protesters and government special unit commanders, public statements by both former and current government officials, bullets and weapons used, types of wounds among both protesters and the police, and the track record of politically motivated misrepresentations by the Maidan politicians of other cases of violence during and after the Euromaidan and historical conflicts.

In particular, this study examines about 30 gigabytes of intercepted radio exchanges of the Security Service of Ukraine Alfa unit, Berkut, the Internal Troops, Omega, and other government agencies during the entire Maidan protests. These files were posted by a pro-Maidan Ukrainian radio amateur on a radio scanners forum, but they never were reported by the media or acknowledged by the Ukrainian government.

The timeline of the massacre with precision to minutes and locations of both the shooters and the government snipers was established in this study with great certainty based on the synchronization of the sound on the main Maidan stage, images, and other sources of evidence that independently corroborate each other.

The study uses content analysis of all publicly available videos of the massacre, in particular, an unreported, time-stamped version of a previously widely seen, long video of the massacre on Instytutska Street, videos of suspected snipers and reports of snipers in live TV broadcasts and Internet video streams from the Maidan (Independence Square), time-stamped and unedited radio intercepts of SBU Alfa snipers and commanders, and radio intercepts of Internal Troops on the Maidan.

The analysis also uses live Internet broadcasts. Recordings of all live TV and Internet broadcasts of the massacre by Espresso TV, Hromadske TV, Spilno TV, Radio Liberty, and Ukrstream TV, were either removed from their websites immediately following the massacre or not made publicly available. These recordings were mostly made by Maidan supporters, but they got very scant attention or removed from public access.

Similarly, official results of ballistic, weapons, and medical examinations and other evidence collected during the investigations concerning this massacre have not been made public, while crucial evidence, including bullets and weapons disappeared under the post-Yanukovych government. This investigation relies on such evidence reported by the media and reliable information in the social media. An on-site research on the site of the massacre on the Maidan itself and on Instytutska Street was also conducted for this study by the author.

An Academic Investigation

A recently released time-stamped version of an over 40-minute-long video, which was filmed at a close distance on Instytutska Street starting at 9:06am, covers, with some unexplained omissions, the most intense parts of the killings. It confirms that the mass killing of Maidan protesters on February 20 began on the adjacent Instytutska Street around that time.

The Berkut anti-riot police and Internal Troops units, which were besieging, storming, and blocking the Maidan for almost three months, hastily abandoned their positions and fled by 9:00am, while protesters then started to advance from their stronghold on the Maidan up Instytutska Street.

This and other videos show members of the special elite unit of the Berkut anti-riot police and “Omega” Internal Troops special unit, including two snipers, temporarily halting the advance of protesters near Zhovtnevyi Palace starting at 9:05am, shooting with both live ammunition from the Kalashnikov assault rifles (AKMS) and rubber bullets, and pointing sniper rifles in the direction of the protesters and then retreating along with Berkut and Internal Troops units, who were resting in Zhovtnevyi Palace.

After retreating to these barricades under fire, respectively, at 9:20am and 9:28am, Berkut and Omega were doing the same from two barricades on Instytutska Street and nearby buildings of the National Bank and the Club of the Cabinet of Ministers.

Directions of many bullet holes and their impact marks in the electric poles, trees, and walls of Zhovtnevyi Palace and the Hotel Ukraina also indicate that the police fired at the direction of the protesters and the protester-held buildings. SBU snipers were located in the Cabinet of Ministers, the Presidential Administration, and neighboring buildings.

The new Ukrainian government and the head of the parliamentary commission publicly stated that “snipers,” who massacred the unarmed protesters, were from these units. Specifically, the Prosecutor General Office announced on September 12, 2014 that its investigation found a Berkut commander and two members of his unit responsible for killing 39 Euromaidan protesters, or the absolute majority of some 50 protesters killed or mortally wounded on February 20, 2014.

Continue reading

THE QUENELLE : THE NEW SIGN OF RESISTANCE

20131128-083421.jpg
We make a quenelle action.
Send me your resistance sign as you take pictures next to any representative of the regime or before its institutions.

Parsifal, November 15, 2013 – lovingenergies

For the connoisseurs of French cuisine, the word ‘Quenelle’ is known.

It is a dish made from minced fish, chicken or meat cooked in water in the form of an oval dumpling.

In fact, the French word derived from the (German) word dumplings.

This article is not about the ‘haute cuisine’ but the explanation why the word ‘Quenelle’ has got a different meaning in France.

It is the expression for ‘f**k you’ or ‘Stick it in your ass’.

Sounds vulgar but is meant as an expression of protest against the elite.

There is also a hand sign and this could become a worldwide symbol of the uprising.

France risks ‘social explosion’ over high taxes

20131128-234046.jpg

The Quenelle is shown in which you stretch your arm straight down indicating with the other one as the measure of the length.

The higher the hand, the longer the measure, the stronger is the symbolic expression of protest.

20131128-083526.jpg

This new meaning has invented the popular French comedian originally from Cameroon Donne Dieudonné or ‘Dieudo’ as he is known in France.

Meanwhile, the character has become very popular with the French, and is exploited ubiquitously is used for ‘f**k the system’, ‘the state can kiss my ass’ or ‘plug it in your ass, Mr. President’.

20131128-083553.jpg

The symbolism has become so popular, the French regime of Hollande is panicking and has taken measures to suppress the symbolism and even prohibit.

The gesture is treated in their eyes as the Hitler salute.

Nevertheless, it is shown at every opportunity.

20131128-091046.jpg

For example, when the French interior minister and upper Zionist Manuel Valls allowed to take a picture with a group of young people.

Unbeknownst to him, the teenagers showed the Quenelle and so what they think of him.

20131128-091125.jpg
This photo with the grinning and unsuspecting Valls in the middle, brought laughter to the whole of France and made the protest sign even more popular.

It has become a sport in France, to approach known politicians to stand next to them, show the Quenelle and to be photographed.

20131128-091158.jpg

Especially the young French show the quenelle at every opportunity, especially when they are photographed next to the officials of the dictatorship.

The photos will then land on the Internet as an expression of protest.

20131128-091228.jpg

We know that France is under the total control of the global financial elite and the population is completely robbed of them.

The Quenelle is mainly directed against the Globalized Banking Industrial Complex.

Therefore, the organization against racism and anti-Semitism has described the Quenelle as ‘reverse Nazi greeting’.

Really, they did.

20131128-091305.jpg

Therefore clearly has crooked-laughed the whole French Internet community.

The regime is not amused and reacted with paranoia, as you would expect from a dictator like Stalin.

They have started a witch hunt and search for hidden ‘quenelles’ everywhere.

If the gesture is detected, especially among civil servants, police or military, then they will be punished.

20131128-091326.jpg

Quenelle Campaign

Of course, this persecution has triggered a flood of photos on the Internet with people showing the Quenelle as resistance to the regime.

Dieudo‘, the inventor of the quenelles, was of course banned from all public appearances on French television and is heavily censored, pelted with mud and slandered.

But his stage performances as a comedian are more popular than ever and he has invited uniformed official in his theatre in Paris, so they perform with him together the quenelle.

The photos are published On his website.

UPDATE

20131128-232336.jpg

20131128-232036.jpg
2 French soldiers doing the Quenelle in front of a Synagogue they are forced to guard are going to be sanctioned by order of the Ministry of Defense

20131128-232109.jpg
Policemen show what they think of the government

We’re now in a frustrating situation, how can we make a ‘regime change in this so-called democracy (laughing), which is completely corrupted, controlled and paid by the moneyed elite and the corporations ?

The ‘Classe politique’ for long not represents our interests.
Millions of people in all Western industrialized countries are totally disgusted with the encrusted power structure because they see no realistic way to change something.
It remains only scorn and derision left.

20131128-232141.jpg

The only ones who are still ‘listening’ (laughing) are the SS, the Secret Services by their mass spying and eavesdropping of all our communications.

Hello slouch hats read along now:
What are you !
Sausages with small cocks !
Shame on you, you traitors to humanity.
How can you have such a crap job ?

We make a quenelle action.

Send me your resistance sign as you take pictures next to any representative of the regime or before its institutions.

Maybe we should take this new protest gesture outside France, because somehow we have to express the resistance of public and ourselves recognize mutually.

20131128-232205.jpg
Monsieur Dieudo shows the Quenelle, stick it up until here, as a protest against the system.

Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of (created) Al Qaeda Led to 9/11

By WashingtonsBlog

isi and cia directors in mujahideen camp1987 Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of Al Qaeda Led to 9/11
Front row, from left: Major Gen. Hamid Gul, director general of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI), Director of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Willian Webster; Deputy Director for Operations Clair George; an ISI colonel; and senior CIA official, Milt Bearden at a Mujahideen training camp in North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan in 1987. (source RAWA)

reaganandmujahideen1 Sleeping With the Devil: How U.S. and Saudi Backing of Al Qaeda Led to 9/11

Ronald Reagan meets Afghan Mujahideen Commanders at the White House in 1985 (Reagan Archives)

Preface:   The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:

Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.

Odom also said:

By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

(audio here).  Background here.

This essay does not address any “inside job” theories for 9/11 or other terrorist attacks on America.  Instead, it focuses on the well-documented fact that the virtually continuous U.S. backing of Al Qaeda terrorists since the late 1970s has led to blowback which has come back to bite us numerous times.

We Created Al Qaeda to Fight the Soviets in Afghanistan

Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on CNN that the U.S. organized and supported Bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda” in the 1970s to fight the Soviets.

Brzezinski told Al Qaeda’s forefathers – the Mujahadin:

We know of their deep belief in god – that they’re confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over – there is yours – and you’ll go back to it some day, because your fight will prevail, and you’ll have your homes, your mosques, back again, because your cause is right, and god is on your side.

CIA director and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates confirmedin his memoir that the U.S. backed the Mujahadin in the 1970s.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton agrees:

MSNBC reportedin 1998:

As his unclassified CIA biography states, bin Laden left Saudi Arabia to fight the Soviet army in Afghanistan after Moscow’s invasion in 1979. By 1984, he was running a front organization known as Maktab al-Khidamar – the MAK – which funneled money, arms and fighters from the outside world into the Afghan war.

What the CIA bio conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified form, at least) is that the MAK was nurtured by Pakistan’s state security services, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIA’s primary conduit for conducting the covert war against Moscow’s occupation.

Continue reading

Terrorists Relate their Attack on a Police Station in Aleppo

 

An armed terrorist group on Tuesday related how they attacked al-Boweider police station in Aleppo province as two police officers were injured and a gun was robbed.

Their attack was confronted by citizens who assisted the police officers in tracking down the armed men until backing-up patrols arrived and killed a terrorist and arrested three other terrorists.

A police officer told the Syrian TV that while they were at the police station, they were overtaken by 10 armed terrorists riding two cars. Continue reading