Putin’s Coup In Jewmerica’s Back Yard

image

By Brother Nathanael, RealJewNews

image

WHILE JEWMERICA RAMPS UP more sanctions against Russia, Putin still has the last laugh.
And while Jewmerica is eating its heart out trying to isolate Russia with its laughable slogan, ‘mobilizing the international community,’ Putin continues to straddle the world stage…this time in Jewmerica’s own backyard in Latin America.

On June 11, Putin brought Russia to the Western Hemisphere with his first stop in Cuba where he met with Fidel and Raul Castro.

After waiving a $32 billion debt owed to Russia, Putin reportedly set his sights on a berth for the Russian Naval fleet at Cuba’s new port of Mariel.

This bodes ill for the Jewish neocon clique, especially Nuland’s tribal chum, Roberta Jacobson, the Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs.

image

The following day, Putin touched down in Nicaragua for a brief visit with trade and government ministers in Nicaragua.

“Your visit here is a ray of light,” President Daniel Ortega told Putin in his opening remarks before the press.

Evidently, talks included Nicaragua approving Russia’s navy ships to dock at its ports.

Later in the day, Putin arrived in Argentina where he met with Argentine president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.

After signing deals which included Russia building a nuclear reactor and talks regarding Russia setting up bases for its satellite system, Kirchner accused America of hypocrisy for its refusal to recognize Crimea’s referendum, but not protesting a similar vote in which residents of a British-controlled archipelago, (that is claimed by Argentina), chose to remain British.

Then Putin landed a knock-out punch on America’s Jew-ruled cheek.

The finishing blow took place in Brazil on July 15 where the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa met in the northeastern city of Fortaleza.

(While many other Latin American leaders attended the conference, Obama couldn’t convince a single leader to shun the BRICS summit in Brazil, Wayne Madsen pointed out.)

At Fortaleza, Putin and his fellow BRIC leaders created the $100 billion “BRICS Development Bank” with a reserve currency pool worth over another $100 billion.

Both are devised to counter Jewmerica’s pernicious “dollar” influence.

New members such as Mexico, Nigeria, and Indonesia, are waiting in the wings to join the new BRIC Development Bank.

“We are implementing a system of measures that prevents the harassment of countries that do not agree with some foreign policy decisions made by the United States and their allies,” Putin told Russian news agency Itar-Tass.

And what Putin told Jewmerica—in so many words—is that the ‘international community’ no longer belongs to the Jewnited States of Jewmerica…

…BUT to a gathering of nations that are sick and tired of Jewish world hegemony.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: to give you an idea of how Powerful will be this BRICS Development Bank, Herebelow is a chart showing the BRICS’members Gold reserves VS the USA Gold reserves. No comment.]

image

Advertisements

ROTHSCHILDS WANT IRAN’S BANKS

By Pete Papaherakles

Could gaining control of the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (CBI) be one of the main reasons that Iran is being targeted by Western and Israeli powers? As tensions are building up for an unthinkable war with Iran, it is worth exploring Iran’s banking system compared to its U.S., British and Israeli counterparts.

Some researchers are pointing out that Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.

Islam forbids the charging of interest, a major problem for the Rothschild banking system. Until a few hundred years ago, charging interest was also forbidden in the Christian world and was even punishable by death. It was considered exploitation and enslavement. Continue reading

World Bank Nominee Tied to Monsanto Shareholder Bill Gates, Soros (creating poverty & stealing natural resources)

By Tim McCoy
NaturalSociety
March 28, 2012

Obama nominated Dartmouth University president Jim Yong Kim, M.D. to head the United Nations World Bank.  Most people think that UN agencies benefit poor people, but this is far from the truth.

The UN World Bank claims to fight poverty in developing nations by financing infrastructure projects. But the UN World Bank is really a tool used to acquire Third World natural resources through conditions on loans that are extremely difficult to repay. The raw resources are then privatized by insider multi-national corporations.  The World Bank actually creates more poverty.

The nomination of Jim Yong Kim indicates that the World Bank may shift away from focusing on infrastructure and will instead turn toward providing health care in Third World countries.  Jim Yong Kim’s areas of interest include vaccines for tuberculosis as well as drugs for HIV and AIDS.

Kim brokered a deal with Big Pharma and the UN World Health Organization for expanding the pharmaceutical drug market to a larger populace in exchange for lower drug prices for second-line tuberculosis drugs.  Second-line drugs are used when basic treatment fails because of drug resistance.  Drug resistance similar to the new ‘resistant White Plague‘ brought about by big pharma’s drugs. Many in the medical community believed it would be dangerous to distribute second-line drugs widely.  Kim is also responsible for pushing HIV/AIDS retroviral drugs in developing nations.

HIV/AIDS drugs used in the Third World have profound side effects that include eye, kidney, liver and heart problems.

Jim Yong Kim says that the highest point in his career was when George Soros donated to Kim’s tuberculosis vaccine program, which was followed by a a huge grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for $44.7 million.  Monsanto shareholder Bill Gates, who has repeatedly stated that Monsanto’s GMOs are the answer to starvation despite scientific proof of the contrary, gave a controversial speech at a Ted conference outlining the controversial population reduction plan through ‘healthcare’:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
Additionally, Kim is the co-founder of Partners in Health along with Paul Farmer who is famous for saying that healthcare is a right.  Healthcare as a “right” disables health freedom to escape the medical health paradigm and choose your own methods of healing.  In addition, it also enables the government to determine whether or not an individual may receive care — the ‘right’ to live or die.  Therefore, this shocking and disturbing program falls into the category of a eugenics-based plan.
Conclusion:

The objective of Jim Yong Kim heading the UN World Bank appears to be to promote ludicrous policies by expanding healthcare through dangerous drugs.  Kim’s support for redistribution of wealth and socialized medicine may come with a tremendous price tag for developed countries (especially the US).  If the UN World Bank was truly a benevolent organization, the focus for the Third World would be on support for independent farming, clean water and food.

Explore More:
  1. World Bank President: ‘One Shock Away From Crisis’
  2. Bill Gates Foundation Buys 500,000 Shares of Monsanto
  3. Monsanto Investor Bill Gates Says GMO Crops Needed to Fight Starvation
  4. How the Bill Gates Foundation is Genetically Manipulating Nature and Devastating Our Health
  5. Sorry Gates: GMO Crops Proven to be Ineffective at Fighting World Hunger
  6. Genetically Engineered Rice Pushed Through by Bill Gates & Monsanto

1984 World Bank Report already contemplates ‘Sterilization Vans’ and ‘Camps’

By Jurriaan Maessen at Infowars.com

In its 1984 World Development Report, the World Bank suggests using “sterilization vans” and “camps” to facilitate its sterilization policies for the third world. The report also threatens nations who are slow in implementing the bank’s population policies with “drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom.”

The report, literally saturated with dehumanizing proposals, is devoted entirely to the World Bank’s long-term strategies in regards to population control and does not shy away from proposing the most draconian methods in order to depopulate the planet:

“Male and female sterilization and IUDs can be made more readily available through mobile facilities (such as sterilization vans in Thailand) or periodic “camps” (such as vasectomy and tubectomy-camps in India and IUD “safaris” in Indonesia).”

To illustrate how serious the World Bank is in achieving the overall strategy objectives on population control, the report makes use of outright threats:

“Population policy has a long lead time; other development policies must adapt in the meantime. Inaction today forecloses options tomorrow, in overall development strategy and in future population policy. Worst of all, inaction today could mean that more drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom, will seem necessary tomorrow to slow population growth.”

In the preface, then President of the World Bank and 1985 Bilderberg attendee, A.W. Clausen stated:

“(…) although the direct costs of The World Bank programs to reduce population growth are not large, a greater commitment by the international community is sorely needed to assist developing countries in the great challenge of slowing population growth.”

“(…) governments can use incentives and disincentives to signal their policy on family size”, the report continues. “Through incentives, society as a whole compensates those couples willing to forgo the private benefits of an additional child, helping to close the gap between private and social gains to high fertility.”

To give an adequate illustration of the World Bank’s preference for all-out government control over the people, and their intent on meddling in people’s personal decisions, the following quote will suffice (page 107):

“By taxing and spending in ways that provide couples with specific incentives and disincentives to limit their fertility, government policy can also affect fertility in the short run. Government can offer “rewards” for women who defer pregnancy; it can compensate people who undergo sterilization for loss of work and travel costs; and it can provide insurance and old-age security schemes for parents who restrict the size of their families. Each of these public policies works through signals which influence individual and family decisions- when to marry, whether to use contraception, how long to send children to school, and life expectancy, and whether and how much family members work.”

Continue reading

Why true African leaders never stand a chance

CounterPsyOps comment: Read the full article. And you’ll understand the parallelism between Thomas Sankara and Libyan Leader Muammar Gaddafi !

An obstinate myth that refuses to die: Africa is incapable of producing responsible leadership. Really?

No African country has experienced genuine democracy after decolonization. Without exception, African leaders were autocratic, corrupt, bloodthirsty tyrants out for one thing only: their own personal enrichment. That’s Africa in a nutshell. At least that’s what the former colonial powers like you to believe.

Examples abound: Mobutu fled Zaire (Congo) with a fortune of half the national debt, there was the grotesque Bokassa in the Central African Republic, gruesome Idi Amin in Uganda, Siad Barre in Somalia, Houphouet-Boigny in Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast), Compaore in Burkina Faso and many more.

These men (they are all “men”) had quite a few things in common: coming to power by military force, full support Continue reading